Seattle Times home page

Citizen Northwest
home page

Tracking the campaigns
Election
calendar

Races/
candidates

Initiatives/
propositions

Times
endorsements

Political
matchmaker

Front Porch
Forum

Election
results

Electronic classroom
Political
primer

Test your
voting smarts

Student
projects

Election
links

Credits



Education
home page

Citizen Northwest
Tracking the campaigns



For the complete text and arguments pertaining to these initiatives, go to the Secretary of State's initiatives pages
State Initiatives on the November ballot


Statewide Initiatives


Initiative No. 173

Ballot Title
Shall the state pay scholarship vouchers for primary and secondary students to attend private or public schools of their choice?

Ballot Measure Summary
This measure would require the state to provide primary and secondary students born after September 1, 1989, with "scholarship vouchers" for use at any eligible public or private school of their choice. Schools with 25 or more students which do not advocate unlawful behavior or discriminate by race, national origin, or gender would be eligible for vouchers. The vouchers must equal at least 55 percent of the government spending per student in the preceding fiscal year.


Initiative No. 177

Ballot Title
Shall voters be authorized to create "renewed" school districts where nonprofit organizations may operate publicly-funded "independent" public schools with parental choice and revised state regulation?

Ballot Measure Summary
This measure would require all school districts to conduct elections on converting to "renewed" districts. The "renewed" districts' parents and/or teachers could convert existing or start new "independent public schools." These would have their own governing boards, receive public funds, and be regulated similar to approved private schools. Parents could choose any school with an opening. "Renewed" districts would furnish classroom space and transportation, in certain circumstances.


Initiative No. 655

Ballot Title
Shall it be a gross misdemeanor to take, hunt, or attract black bears with bait, or to hunt bears, cougars, bobcat or lynx with dogs?

Ballot Measure Summary
This measure would make it unlawful to take, hunt, or attract black bear with the aid of bait. Bait could still be used by employees or agent of federal, state, or county agencies acting to protect livestock, domestic animals, private property, or the public safety. Feeding stations could be established for bears in order to prevent damage to commercial timber land. The director of fish and wildlife could authorize public agencies or educational or scientific institutions to use bait to attract black bear for scientific purposes.

The measure would also make it unlawful to hunt or pursue black bear, cougar, bobcat, or lynx with the aid of one or more dogs. Dogs could still be used by employees or agents of federal, state, or county government to protect livestock, domestic animals, private property, or the public safety. The director of fish and wildlife could issue permits to use dogs to trap or kill animals damaging crops, domestic animals, fowl, or property, and could authorize public agencies or scientific or educational institutions to use dogs for the pursuit of black bear, cougar, bobcat, or lynx for scientific purposes.

A violation of this measure would be a gross misdemeanor. In addition to criminal penalties, violators would have their hunting licenses revoked for five years in the case of a first violation, and permanently for a subsequent violation.


Initiative No. 670

Ballot Title
Shall the secretary of state be instructed to place a ballot notice concerning congressional and legislative candidates who have not supported Congressional term limits?

Ballot Measure Summary
This measure would declare support for a federal constitutional amendment limiting United States Representatives to three terms and United States Senators to two terms, and would instruct each member of the state's congressional delegation to support this amendment. A ballot notice would be placed by the name of any incumbent sentator or representative who fails to support the amendment and by the name of any nonincumbent candidate who fails to pledge to support term limits.


Initiative No. 671

Ballot Title
Shall amended tribal/state agreements be authorized permitting limited electronic gaming on Indian lands for tribal governent purposes, with joint regulation and specified use of revenues?

Ballot Measure Summary
This measure would amend existing tribal/state agreements to allow limited electronic gaming, subject to tribal/state regulation, in tribally-owned facilities on Indian land, with limitations on location, number of facilities, hours, wagers, number of devices, and use of revenues. The tribal share of revenues would be designated for economic development, government, and social programs. The state's share would be dedicated to salmon restoration and enhancement, local economic development, costs of regulation, public safety, and local charities.

Consult our Political Primer for more information on the way initiatives work.





Back to TopSeattle Times HomeClassifiedsFeedbackSitemap

Permission to repost or reprint any material on this site must be obtained
by contacting Barbara Davis at The Seattle Times, (206) 464-2310, bdav-new@seatimes.com


Copyright © 1996 The Seattle Times Company