![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Your account | Today's news index | Weather | Traffic | Movies | Restaurants | Today's events | ||||||||
|
|
Friday, October 15, 2004 - Page updated at 12:01 a.m. State Representative, District -- 10, Position -- 2 Party: Democrat Residence: Camano Island Education: Criminal Justice Degree, Everett Community College - 1994 Political offices held: None.
Public service and volunteer experience: *1986 - Present
Endorsements: * Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, 10th District (D).
Campaign theme: Quality of Life, Community, Choice.
Questions for candidatesWhat are the biggest differences between you and your opponent(s)? I belive the most important thing government does is serve the needs of the citizens of Washington, rather than the big business special interests. Instead of spending time trying to figure out how to make drug companies and developers happy, I will spend time working to make jobs more secure and families better served by government services. What are your highest priorities for state government? If you had to close the projected $1 billion gap between state government revenues and expenses, how would you do it? To close the cavernous budget gap, we will have to consider measures all over the board: there can be few sacred cows. The equation is simple: either raise revenue (taxes), or decrease spending (service and budget cuts). The solution will necessarily comprise both of these elements. Performance audits, VET refinements, closing corporate tax loopholes, etc. During the process, however, I will work to prevent any service cuts from hurting those most in need. Do you support the initiative to raise the sales tax 1 penny to raise money for schools and higher education? Much as I hate to pay more taxes, YES. We must to invest in our schools -- now. Are you happy with Washington's new primary? Are you supporting the initiative that would give Washington a "top 2" primary system that the parties oppose? I loathe the new primary system. I will support the top 2 system only because it is the lesser of the two evils. The new primary system was created largely because the two major parties were concerned that their opponents would vote across party lines in the primary to set-up a weak opponent for their candidate to face in the general election. What a shame that we are left with this anemic primary system due to these types of concerns. What do you think of the initiative to expand the use of slot machines to reduce taxes? I don't support it, even though the tax revenue is attractive. The fact is that today, you have to actually GO somewhere to gamble in anything like a casino. If we allow these machines almost everywhere, we will see the detrimental effects that follow unfettered access to gaming. This will affect the poor and those least able to afford it. *** I would support looking at compromise legislation, though, as the tribal gambling monopoly isn't fair either.
Contact
370 N East Camano Drive
Campaign Web site:
|
|
||||||
seattletimes.com home
Home delivery
| Contact us
| Search archive
| Site map
| Low-graphic
NWclassifieds
| NWsource
| Advertising info
| The Seattle Times Company