![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Your account | Today's news index | Weather | Traffic | Movies | Restaurants | Today's events | ||||||||
|
|
Friday, October 15, 2004 - Page updated at 12:01 a.m. State Representative, District -- 46, Position -- 1 Party: Democrat Date of birth: April 9, 1953 Residence: 7318 54th Ave NE, Seattle Education: B.A. Macalester College, M.P.P. (public policy) U of Michigan, Ph.D. (economics) U of Washington
Political offices held: Elected:
Public service and volunteer experience: Caseload Forecast Council, State of Washington, since 1998; chair, 2002-present.
Endorsements: Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
Campaign theme: Fiscal reform to better fund public schools, health, parks and transit.
Questions for candidatesWhat are the biggest differences between you and your opponent(s)? Experience: I have 25 years of experience in government policy, teaching, applied research and consulting, specializing in labor economics and public finance. I was the founder and director of the Fiscal Policy Center at the University of Washington for 5 years, and I have been on the faculty of the University’s Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs for over 15 years. I have served as a policy advisor to congressional committee chairmen and Washington governors, and maintain an economic consulting practice with a national consulting firm. I have also lived in north Seattle for 23 years, where I have raised three children and have been active in their public schools, sports teams and in my church. What are your highest priorities for state government? If you had to close the projected $1 billion gap between state government revenues and expenses, how would you do it? Better funding for public education, including higher education. Two years ago the governor proposed a budget with deep cuts in education and health care. I helped craft, and voted for, a spending and tax plan to restore many of these cuts. However, the Republican Senate wouldn't agree and forced us to set aside voter-approved commitments to teacher salary increases and class size reductions and cut tens of millions of dollars in core funding for higher education. We need to restore our children's future by restoring this funding and building our knowledge base to create new ideas, new technologies, new products, new markets and new jobs. Currently we forecast a $570 million ending fund balance for this biennium. Next biennium, anticipated expenditures are approximately $700 million more than the revenues we now expect for the same period. As in the past, we will look for opportunities to use funds left over from this biennium to offset future costs. We will also look for efficiencies and savings in the base budget, prioritize our spending needs and at the same time review and prioritize tax exemptions for possible elimination before considering general tax increases as a last resort. Given the history of past recoveries, it may still be too early to tell how much may be needed. Clearly, the answer to this question depends heavily on the fate of the Education Trust Fund - Initiative 884. I have endorsed this initiative, and I hope it passes. Do you support the initiative to raise the sales tax 1 penny to raise money for schools and higher education? Yes, I support the Education Trust Fund. Investments in education are critical in preparing our children for the information-based economy of the future. A well-educated workforce is paramount in making Washington an attractive and competitive place to do business. Are you happy with Washington's new primary? Are you supporting the initiative that would give Washington a "top 2" primary system that the parties oppose? No, I would have preferred to retain the blanket primary. However, I do not support the "top 2" or "cajun" primary either. The "cajun" primary is a false alternative that will give more voters fewer choices by forcing all but the dominant parties off the ballot in the general election, when the number of voters is the greatest. This is NOT the way to encourage voter participation. As an alternative, I will propose that we amend our current primary ballot to include a designation of "INDEPENDENT," and allow these voters to vote for whomever they choose. Then we should give the parties the option of accepting independent votes...I don't think it would take the parties long to "opt-in" and recognize the value of independent voters. What do you think of the initiative to expand the use of slot machines to reduce taxes? I am opposed to this measure. It would vastly expand gambling, and problem gambling, in Washington, but would very likely take most of these revenues from the state lottery and the tribes. The net gain in revenues is likely to be far less than the proponents of this measure expect, leaving yet another hole in the state and local capacity to provide critical public services.
Contact
7318 54TH AVE NE
Campaign Web site:
|
|
||||||
seattletimes.com home
Home delivery
| Contact us
| Search archive
| Site map
| Low-graphic
NWclassifieds
| NWsource
| Advertising info
| The Seattle Times Company