Ad Info

seattletimes.com navigation
Election 2000 : State Legislature : Candidate Bio

Voters Guide
President
U.S. Congress
Governor & Other Executive Offices
State Legislature
Judicial Races
Ballot Measures
Voter FAQs
 
Endorsements
Editorials & Opinion
 








Dan Roach, Republican
 
Candidate: State Representative,
Dan Roach
Dan Roach
  District 31, Position 1
 
Age: 27
 
Residence: Bonney Lake
 
Occupation:
  Mortgage broker, owner of MK Gymnastics
 
Education:
  B.A. in political science, Brigham Young University
 
Political history:
  Candidate for state representative, 1998
 
Endorsements:
  Washington Taxpayers Association, King County Police Officers Guild, National Federation of Independent Businesses
 
Campaign Web site: None
 
Campaign theme:
  Restoring integrity and honesty to public office.
 

 
1.  What is your position on the initiatives proposed on this year's November ballot?
  I-713 - Animal trapping no response
  I-722 - Property taxes yes
  I-728 - School district financing yes
  I-729 - Charter schools yes
  I-732 - Teacher raises yes
  I-745 - Transportation funding no response
 
2.  Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has declared blanket primary elections like Washington's violate political parties' constitutional rights, what form of new primary election system would you propose adopting?
  Many ideas have been proposed. I favor hearings to review all possible solutions so that we can protect the rights of parties and ensure maximum participation from the public.
 
3.  Would you continue the trend of recent years and support tax cuts for businesses? Which ones specifically? If not, why?
  I will support reducing the unfair and highly regressive business-and-occupation tax so that small businesses can create more jobs and improve our quality of life.
 
4.  Would you support a Constitutional amendment that would allow tax breaks for homeowners but not for business or commercial property? Why or why not?
  The uniformity clause in our Washington state Constitution does not allow split rolls and I concur. I would like to make reductions for all of us.
 
5.  What privacy legislation would you support? Would you exempt financial institutions? Why or why not?
  I strongly support protecting people's privacy in their financial dealings, medical records, Internet and other related privacy issues. I favor stronger laws to prosecute offenders of identity theft and credit damage. I would not exempt business. Nor would I exempt government, the biggest intruder of all.
 
6.  A commission studying transportation funding says a new financing mechanism is needed to keep Washington transportation projects on track. How would you propose financing future transportation projects?
  Government must show that it is spending money wisely on transportation methods that work. I would support earmarking dollars for specific programs. I would support dedicating a portion of automobile-related sales tax to funding roads.
 
7.  With some states reconsidering the death penalty, what is your position and what changes, if any, do you think are needed in Washington's law? Under what circumstances would you support a moratorium?
  I support the death penalty because it helps protect our children and families. It is a protector of public safety because a murderer, if executed, is deterred from ever murdering again. In 1975, voters in Washington voted overwhelmingly in favor of the death penalty in the form of Initiative 316.
 
8.  A judge struck down Initiative 695's provision that would have required a public vote for all tax and fee increases. Would you support a Constitutional amendment that would require the public vote? Why or why not?
  It's a shame that government has not been responsive to the citizens' need for tax relief. I support what the voters have done.

 


Ad Info
[ seattletimes.com home ]
[ Classified Ads | NWsource.com | Contact Us | Search Archive ]

Copyright © 2000 The Seattle Times Company

Back to Top