Ad Info

seattletimes.com navigation
Election 2000 : State Legislature : Candidate Bio

Voters Guide
President
U.S. Congress
Governor & Other Executive Offices
State Legislature
Judicial Races
Ballot Measures
Voter FAQs
 
Endorsements
Editorials & Opinion
 








Rosemary McAuliffe, Democrat (Incumbent)
 
Candidate: State Senator, District 1
Rosemary McAuliffe
Rosemary McAuliffe
 
Age: 60
 
Residence: Bothell
 
Occupation:
  Owner and manager, Hollywood Schoolhouse and Hana Sushi Restaurant
 
Education:
  B.S., nursing, Seattle University
 
Political history:
  State Senate 1993-present; Northshore School Board member, 1977-1991, president 1981-1982
 
Endorsements:
  Washington Education Association, Sierra Club, Children's Campaign Fund
 
Campaign Web site: http://www.mcauliffe1.com
 
Campaign theme: No response.
 

 
1.  What is your position on the initiatives proposed on this year's November ballot?
  I-713 - Animal trapping no
  I-722 - Property taxes no
  I-728 - School district financing yes
  I-729 - Charter schools no
  I-732 - Teacher raises yes
  I-745 - Transportation funding no
 
2.  Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has declared blanket primary elections like Washington's violate political parties' constitutional rights, what form of new primary election system would you propose adopting?
  We need a good, solid system so that all people feel they have a voice in the primary elections. I am supportive of waiting through this election cycle and giving this issue full consideration in the next legislative session.
 
3.  Would you continue the trend of recent years and support tax cuts for businesses? Which ones specifically? If not, why?
  My record shows I have supported B&O tax cuts, manufacturing tax cuts and I will support future targeted tax cuts to benefit businesses and the economy.
 
4.  Would you support a Constitutional amendment that would allow tax breaks for homeowners but not for business or commercial property? Why or why not?
  I voted to support a tax cut for homeowners because it was the right thing to do. I was given sound legal advice that this legislation did not require a constitutional amendment.
 
5.  What privacy legislation would you support? Would you exempt financial institutions? Why or why not?
  I would support privacy legislation that protected an individual's right to his or her own privacy, especially involving financial institutions. I supported the provisions in Attorney General Christine Gregoire's bill. I also voted for strong privacy protections in the "patient's bill of rights."
 
6.  A commission studying transportation funding says a new financing mechanism is needed to keep Washington transportation projects on track. How would you propose financing future transportation projects?
  I hope to support the governor's blue ribbon commission recommendations, and I would support a gas tax or sales tax for a comprehensive and planned transportation system.
 
7.  With some states reconsidering the death penalty, what is your position and what changes, if any, do you think are needed in Washington's law? Under what circumstances would you support a moratorium?
  Washington state has been a conservative state when it has initiated the death penalty. I support this. However, given the new research on DNA procedures, I would support a moratorium to validate the research.
 
8.  A judge struck down Initiative 695's provision that would have required a public vote for all tax and fee increases. Would you support a Constitutional amendment that would require the public vote? Why or why not?
  I would not support a constitutional amendment that would require a public vote for tax and fee increases. I believe in representative government and support the constitution of the state of Washington as written.

 


Ad Info
[ seattletimes.com home ]
[ Classified Ads | NWsource.com | Contact Us | Search Archive ]

Copyright © 2000 The Seattle Times Company

Back to Top