Ad Info

seattletimes.com navigation
Election 2000 : State Legislature : Candidate Bio

Voters Guide
President
U.S. Congress
Governor & Other Executive Offices
State Legislature
Judicial Races
Ballot Measures
Voter FAQs
 
Endorsements
Editorials & Opinion
 








Don Bingham, Libertarian
 
Candidate: State Representative,
Don Bingham
Don Bingham
  District 31, Position 1
 
Age: 71
 
Residence: Sumner
 
Occupation:
  Retired industrial engineer
 
Education:
  B.A. in education, Western Washington University
 
Political history: None
 
Endorsements: None
 
Campaign Web site: None
 
Campaign theme:
  Protect the Bill of Rights, help to lower taxes.
 

 
1.  What is your position on the initiatives proposed on this year's November ballot?
  I-713 - Animal trapping yes
  I-722 - Property taxes yes
  I-728 - School district financing no
  I-729 - Charter schools yes
  I-732 - Teacher raises yes
  I-745 - Transportation funding yes
 
2.  Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has declared blanket primary elections like Washington's violate political parties' constitutional rights, what form of new primary election system would you propose adopting?
  No primary, each party puts up their best person.
 
3.  Would you continue the trend of recent years and support tax cuts for businesses? Which ones specifically? If not, why?
  All businesses, they don't pay taxes they just collect for the government.
 
4.  Would you support a Constitutional amendment that would allow tax breaks for homeowners but not for business or commercial property? Why or why not?
  No, things would just cost more.
 
5.  What privacy legislation would you support? Would you exempt financial institutions? Why or why not?
  I don't understand the question.
 
6.  A commission studying transportation funding says a new financing mechanism is needed to keep Washington transportation projects on track. How would you propose financing future transportation projects?
  Pass Initiative 745.
 
7.  With some states reconsidering the death penalty, what is your position and what changes, if any, do you think are needed in Washington's law? Under what circumstances would you support a moratorium?
  I am opposed to the death penalty.
 
8.  A judge struck down Initiative 695's provision that would have required a public vote for all tax and fee increases. Would you support a Constitutional amendment that would require the public vote? Why or why not?
  Yes.

 


Ad Info
[ seattletimes.com home ]
[ Classified Ads | NWsource.com | Contact Us | Search Archive ]

Copyright © 2000 The Seattle Times Company

Back to Top