Ad Info

seattletimes.com navigation
Election 2000 : Judicial Races : Candidate Bio

Voters Guide
President
U.S. Congress
Governor & Other Executive Offices
State Legislature
Judicial Races
Ballot Measures
Voter FAQs
 
Endorsements
Editorials & Opinion
 








Tom Chambers
 
Candidate: State Supreme Court, Position 9
Tom Chambers
Tom Chambers
 
Age: 56
 
Residence: Issaquah
 
Occupation:
  Attorney
 
Education:
  J.D., University of Washington
 
Campaign Web site: www.tomchambers.com
 
Campaign theme:
  Level playing field.
 
Rating: Exceptionally well-qualified
 

 
1.  Do you support the current system of electing judges? Why, or why not?
  I would support a hybrid between appointment and election. Currently we run the risk of a completely unqualified person being elected to our state's highest court because that person has a "good name." Appointment provides more judicial independence. Elections force judges to deal with the concerns of people.
 
2.  Name a state Supreme Court ruling that you would have joined the majority on and explain why.
  A recent U.S. Supreme Court opinion barring states from disclosing personal information people must submit to obtain a driver's license. Our rights of privacy must be protected.
 
3.  Name one where you would have dissented and explain why.
  The King County stadium case in which the court ducked the question of whether an emergency existed. I believe that the genius of our government is based upon its checks and balances. The court should make an independent decision regarding the standards for emergency legislation.
 
4.  Do you think judicial candidates should have more leeway in what they can say in a campaign, or do you support current restrictions?
  I am content with the current standards. I do not believe that the court should be politicalized. I believe that judges should be selected based upon their passion for justice, fairness and intellectual honesty.
 
5.  What is the biggest problem facing the state court system and how would you address it?
  Under-funding, an antiquated system developed in the 1800s, and institutional inertia have caused a crisis in our courts. There are plenty of good proposals which have been studied. I offer my proven leadership to move proposals to implementation. I have led the State Bar and other lawyer associations.

 


Ad Info
[ seattletimes.com home ]
[ Classified Ads | NWsource.com | Contact Us | Search Archive ]

Copyright © 2000 The Seattle Times Company

Back to Top