| Cover Story | Postscripts | Now & Then |
WRITTEN BY FRED NELSON |
||||||||||||||
![]() Captured in moments, the year we knew
Awe. Amusement. Sorrow. Compassion. And, understanding. Newspaper photography, done well, can elicit these things. And more. We know this. But why? Certainly much can be made of light and composition, gesture and expression, the decisive moment. All good photos have some combination of these elements. But what separates the really good from the merely well-executed? Interestingly, the newsroom lingo for a photograph is "art," left over from the time before photography when newspaper artists made woodcuts to illustrate stories. Newsroom "budgets" describing stories in progress carry a tagline indicating "art" or "no art" (though one editor occasionally amuses himself by changing the tagline for particularly dull pieces of writing from "no art" to "artless"). But the truth is, newspaper photographs are not Art. They're uncomfortable on the walls of galleries. They prefer hanging around on the cheap paper, having a little give and take with the words and the readers.
The way we experience good photos is something more than merely "reading" them. We experience them in an almost instantaneous and physical way, as though our understanding of them flows straight through the eyes into the bloodstream. And where that understanding settles can vary. Sometimes it lands in your head. Other times it hits your heart or your gut.
Photographs bring life to the newspaper. Ironically, the photograph's power comes from the freezing of time, the very stillness of the picture being part of its strength. A television news image flits across the screen and is gone, replaced by other images in the endless stream. A good newspaper picture beckons patiently, inviting readers to take a second look. That is how a couple of guys celebrating the recovery of a coworker's purse can become our collective sigh of relief at surviving an earthquake, or the simple tearful expression on a young woman's face can connect our shared grief over Sept. 11. This pursuit of the essence of a subject is a difficult business. In the purest sense, it may be, like the pursuit of "objective" reporting, a fool's mission. Consider the complications: An almost limitless variety of possible subjects may await photographers as they come to work each day. Complicating things further is the necessity to make the photograph when the photograph needs to be made. There is no rewind button in the life of a community. A picture is either made or it is missed. Somewhere near a million people will read this newspaper today. There is some pressure. Most hours of the day some Seattle Times photographer is out in our community, pursuing the essence of a moment. Displayed here are some of the best of those efforts.
Fred Nelson is a Seattle Times picture editor.
|
||||||||||||||
| Cover Story | Postscripts | Now & Then |
| seattletimes.com home Copyright © 2001 The Seattle Times Company |