Originally published Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Comments (0)
E-mail article
Print view
Wine Adviser
A cautionary tale on traveling with wine
With the holidays looming, many wine lovers are planning to travel to family gatherings in other parts of the country. Perhaps you thought you...
![]() |
Special to the Seattle Times
Pick of the Week
Don Rodolfo 2006 Pinot Noir; $10. This Argentine offering is from a mile-high vineyard in the Cafayate Valley, near the Bolivian border. It's a warm days/cool nights kind of place, with the added benefit of high mountain sunshine. The ultraviolet radiation brings added complexity without over-ripening. This is light and tart, beautifully aromatic and quite clean through the finish. (Distributed by Grape Expectations)With the holidays looming, many wine lovers are planning to travel to family gatherings in other parts of the country. Perhaps you thought you would take along a special bottle or two to enjoy with your friends and family. Not so fast, bucko!
These days, wine cannot be carried on board a plane; it must be checked as luggage. Which is why the following e-mail should serve as a cautionary tale.
Sent to me by reader Dennis Smith of Rockville, Md., it was titled, "Sea-Tac airport wine mishap." "Mishap," in this instance, was perhaps too kind. It seems that Smith, his wife and a companion had just spent eight days exploring Washington and Oregon wine country. They purchased three cases of wine to take back home to Maryland, planning to check it as luggage.
"The sole purpose of this trip," Smith writes, "was to visit wine regions and bring back wines not available where we live. Our trip was going wonderfully ... and then we arrived at Sea-Tac airport, where things took an absolute turn for the worst.
"My wife, myself and our friend attempted to check the three cases of wine we had collected. The ticket agent explained we were allowed just five liters of wine [about six bottles] per person as checked luggage. We found this to be odd, as for the past five years we have been traveling to California and have checked on cases of wine as luggage many times. The agent explained this was a TSA [Transportation Security Administration] regulation.
"In truth, that regulation states you may check as luggage an unlimited amount of an alcoholic beverage as long as it's less than 24 percent alcohol."
Smith, let the record show, is absolutely correct. In fact, the federal regs (www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtravel/assistant/editorial_1189.shtm) read as follows:
"Carrying Alcohol In Your Checked Baggage: Please note, you can't take alcoholic beverages with more than 70 percent alcohol content (140 proof), including 95 percent grain alcohol and 150 proof rum, in your checked luggage.
"You may take up to five liters of alcohol with alcohol content between 24 percent and 70 percent per person as checked luggage if it's packaged in a sealable bottle or flask. Alcoholic beverages with less than 24 percent alcohol content are not subject to hazardous materials regulations."
In other words, wines — even fortified wines such as Port — are not subject to the five-liter rule. Unfortunately, the story does not end here. Smith explains what happened next:
"I replied to the agent she was mistaken about TSA's regulation; the five-liter rule doesn't apply to wine. I requested she get her manager so we could clear this up. An airline supervisor came. The agent was correct, we were told, and five liters was the limit for all alcohol regardless of the alcohol content. We were in absolute shock that not only was the agent not aware of the regulations but neither was the supervisor!
"We spent the next hour trying to find ways to get the other 1 ½ cases of wine home. We went to [another airline's] ticket counter and explained the troubles we were having. To our surprise that agent stated that [her airline] too only allows five liters of alcohol to be checked as luggage per person — regardless of the alcohol content. We had no choice but to find a way to dispose of the wine."
Here's the capper:
"The agent asked if she could have the wine. So we let her have hundreds of dollars' worth of wine. Once home I decided to look on TSA's Web site. The sad thing was, we were correct about the regulations, and both airlines didn't have a clue.
"My reason for this e-mail is to alert other people that may try to check on wine as luggage through Sea-Tac, or any other airport for that matter. Have a copy of the regulations on hand. We will now always have a copy of the regulations when we travel to wine country."
The (somewhat) happy ending ... after weeks of haggling, Smith finally did receive reimbursement for the loss of the wines. Better still, he tells me, the airline admitted that its employees "were unaware of the law pertaining to the regulations for checking wine as luggage ... and are to be properly trained and should now be aware of the regulations."
Attempts to contact Sea-Tac personnel for a response to this issue were unsuccessful. However, I will echo Smith: If you plan to check wine as luggage, call your airline in advance and make certain it is familiar with these regulations. Print out a copy to carry with you, just in case.
Last, but not least: How should you pack wine to minimize the chance of breakage? The safest, most secure way is to place the wine in a separate piece of luggage, wrapped in many layers of cloth, Bubble Wrap, etc. For those who want the very best protection, I recommend the wine travel cases made by Winecruzer (www.winecruzer.com/). They're not cheap, but they are incredibly sturdy, water- and airtight and come in a range of sizes, some with wheels and telescoping handles.
Paul Gregutt is the author of "Washington Wines and Wineries The Essential Guide." His column appears weekly in the Wine section. He can be reached by e-mail at wine@seattletimes.com.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
More Wine Adviser headlines...
E-mail article
Print view Share:
Digg
Newsvine
![]()
wine@seattletimes.com

PNW Magazine | Easy As Pie
A little friendly competition between professional pie-baker Kate McDermott and The Seatttle Times' Kathleen Triesch Saul is handled with great taste.
nwautos
Local riders say they've seen a surge in scooter interest in recent years, mostly from people wanting another commuting option. Seattle now ranks as o...
Post a comment
nwjobs
Post a comment
Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
Do you suffer from "sitting disease"?
Post a comment
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Tugboat sinks at Seattle waterfront pier
- Illegal workers quietly let go
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
- Craigslist adoption ad: A plea by young mother-to-be? A scam?
- Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
- Woman stabbed by stranger in North Seattle
- Snow piles up on Cascade slopes
- Denny Triangle gains skyline, but tenants slow to come
- Illegal workers quietly let go
374 - Climate change speeds up since 1997 Kyoto accord
210 - Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
171 - Metro won't cut bus service after all
156 - New Husky recruit: Enes Kanter
98 - Historic health care bill clears Senate hurdle
95 - Tattoos at Mill Creek Church pierce skin, soul
83 - Middleton says Huskies "plan on scoring at least 50 points'' Saturday
82 - Jerry Brewer: Seahawks can't lean on the Hutch Crutch now
74 - Seattle woman charged with knife attack on boyfriend's ex
66
- Sprouts, raw fish on attorney's 'do not eat' list
- Tattoos at Mill Creek church pierce skin, soul
- Food-safety lawyer's wish: Put me out of business
- Illegal workers quietly let go
- Architects, chefs find 'kid' within to build Gingerbread Village
- Rediscovering Moab, 'the most beautiful place on Earth'
- It's possible to recover a life lost to hoarding
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Taste | The Great Pie Bake-off pits friends and fruit






