Originally published June 17, 2008 at 12:00 AM | Page modified June 18, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Travel Troubleshooter
How to fight an airline when flight is canceled
Q: We've had a problem with a missing flight segment that I've tried to resolve for the last six months. We were hoping you could help. Here's what happened: We had...
Tribune Media Services
Q: We've had a problem with a missing flight segment that I've tried to resolve for the last six months. We were hoping you could help.
Here's what happened: We had seats booked on a British Airways flight from Calgary to Rome with a connection in London. When the airline e-mailed my confirmation, I noticed that a leg was missing.
I called British Airways and asked how we were supposed to get to London. The agent informed me that our flight had been canceled but didn't give me a reason. I asked to be rebooked on the flight for that evening and was told no seats were available. But that was wrong. When I checked online, I found that there were seats — in first class.
Our travel agent got us on a flight the next day. But we lost a day of our vacation and a night's stay at our hotel in Rome that we had to pay for, but not enjoy. We also had to pay a 120-euro fee for being no-shows at our hotel in Rome.
It turns out our original flight had been canceled because of a lack of cabin crew. I filed an e-mail complaint, but British Airways said it canceled the flight because "circumstances were beyond their control." Since then, I've heard nothing from British Airways. I've called, e-mailed and written to the airline. But there's been no response. What should we do?
Karen Kernohan, Calgary, Canada
A: British Airways should have put you on the next available flight in which it had seats available, which it did.According to the airline's general conditions of carriage www.britishairways.com/travel/genconcarr1/public/en_us — the contract between the airline and you — it should have rebooked you on the next flight.
Rule 9, Section B number 3 promises the airline will "carry you as soon as we can to the destination shown on your ticket on another of our scheduled services on which a seat is available in the class of service for which you have paid the fare," according to the contract.
But that's not all it should have done for you. EU Rule 261 says you were owed compensation for the cancellation. (I won't go into too many details, but I've blogged about the rule in more detail here (www.elliott.org/blog/5-things-you-need-to-know-about-eu-regulation-2612004/)). As I read Article 7 of the rule, you should have been offered 600 euros for your cancellation.
There's a loophole in the rule that British Airways is taking advantage of. It says air carriers are off the hook when a cancellation occurs "in extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken."
British Airways believes a crew shortage is an extraordinary circumstance. I don't.
Actually, the "extraordinary circumstances" excuse is commonly used by airlines flying to and from Europe. And there's only one way to close the loophole: You have to threaten to sue them. Politely.
![]()
In your correspondence with an airline invoking circumstances, you need to mention in the first or second sentence that if this isn't resolved to your satisfaction, you may be forced to take the matter to a European court. The airlines are nervous that a court will define "extraordinary circumstances" and that they won't like the definition.
Like other airlines, British Airways stops corresponding with a passenger when it considers the matter closed. It doesn't matter that you think your problem is unresolved. Few air carriers bother to put it into those terms, but some actually do. I recently saw a letter from Air Canada in which it told a passenger, "this case is considered closed and you should not anticipate a response to any further communication dealing with the same issues."
Under most circumstances, threatening a lawsuit would be a last resort. But in a situation like this, where an airline is exploiting a contractual loophole, it would be my first move.
I contacted British Airways on your behalf, and it apologized for the cancellation. It insisted that extraordinary circumstances were to blame for the cancellation, but it agreed to refund your 120-euro no-show fee. It also sent you a $200 voucher for your trouble.
Christopher Elliott is the ombudsman for National Geographic Traveler magazine. His syndicated column runs weekly on seattletimes.com. Contact him at celliott@ngs.org.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
How to save money, energy on Thanksgiving road trip
Southwest's "bags fly free" policy is landing new customers
Snow globes? TSA will likely just say 'no'
Finding youthful spirits on elder-filled cruise
Unions urge Obama to fix ailing airlines

Opening day at Crystal Mountain
Skiers crowded the slopes at Crystal Mountain for one of the resort's earliest openings.
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- Homeless man, 46, arrested in Greenwood arsons
- KVI talk radio host off the air as of Thursday
- Steve Kelley | ESPN's Bill Simmons gets us: He hates Clay Bennett, too
- Police investigate videotaped arrest
- Seattle U. Men's Hoops | Big recruit goes from Huskies to Redhawks
- Mariners sign Jack Wilson to 2-year contract
- Razor found in muffin an accident, 'mortified' baker says
- Suspect's family shaken by slaying of police officer
- Mountlake Terrace woman reports razor in muffin
- Man says he will protest city's gun ban by carrying gun into community center
- Police investigate videotaped arrest
635 - OSU game thread
611 - Seattle man to pack a pistol into community center to protest mayor's ban
355 - GOP clueless as families struggle with health care
195 - Mariners sign Jack Wilson to 2-year contract
145 - NYC trial for 9/11 suspects poses risks
132 - Wright State game thread
97 - Band of advocates, activists now McGinn's likely insiders
95 - Licata looks at boosting traffic-ticket revenue
87 - Kent man challenges Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels' gun ban
74
- Light rail to airport to begin Dec. 19
- Homeless man, 46, arrested in Greenwood arsons
- Ivar's undersea billboards a hoax devised as marketing ploy
- Light rail to airport to begin Dec. 19
- Steve Kelley | ESPN's Bill Simmons gets us: He hates Clay Bennett, too
- An 802.11n upgrade could make a big difference
- KVI talk radio host off the air as of Thursday
- Washington in race for federal education funds
- Police investigate videotaped arrest
- Goodwill's Glitter Sale is Nov. 14-15





