Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Follow the latest stories and blog updates of politics across the region or check out our national politics coverage.

Politics Northwest

The Seattle Times political team explores national, state and local politics.

Blog Home | RSS feeds Subscribe

July 27, 2010 at 5:02 PM

Comments (12)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Inslee, McDermott vote against war spending bill

Posted by Kyung M. Song

CORRECTED VERSION: This story originally said Inslee voted against President Bush's decision to go to war. He supported the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 but opposed the war in Iraq that started in 2003.

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. House on Tuesday evening passed a $59 billion war funding bill that isn't paid for -- and it was Democrats, not Republicans, crying foul against further deficit spending.

The House voted 308 to 114 for the emergency supplemental appropriations for the war in Afghanistan. Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Bainbridge Island, and Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Seattle, were the only House members from Washington state to vote nay.

Both Inslee and McDermott cited the cost of a war that is now nearly a decade old. On the House floor, Inslee said lack of money could force the Lynnwood Police Department to trim a quarter of its employees while Congress is asked to spend $4 billion to train police officers in Kabul.

"It is wrong to be borrowing money from China, laying off American police officers, to train police officers in Afghanistan," Inslee said.

Inslee supported President Bush's decision to invade Afghanistan in 2001, but opposed the war in Iraq that started in 2003. Nonetheless,he has voted for deficit spending to pay for the wars, most recenlty in 2009. Inslee said he wanted to give the new Obama administration a chance to start winding down the war -- something Inslee said he sees no real indication of happening.

Meanwhile, the rising deficit, the recession and the accumulating years of combat have made it untenable to keep pouring billions of dollars into the war, he said.

"My position has not changed," Inslee said. "The world has changed."

As for McDermott, he said he sees no point in spending any more money on a problem that U.S. troops can't solve.

"If we really want to help the Afghan people form a functioning government that serves its people and respects human rights, we must do it with additional aid and support -- not with more troops."

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

As a constituent of Jim McDermott, I want to say that he has perfectly represent me by his "nay" vote. Thank you so much. I applaud this...  Posted on July 27, 2010 at 6:52 PM by chb. Jump to comment
chb, i'm with you on stopping the war. but note this bill is hardly a "gift" to afghanistan, rather a gift to halliburton and co....  Posted on July 27, 2010 at 7:31 PM by chippie. Jump to comment
Very good.  Posted on July 27, 2010 at 5:46 PM by Unaffiliated. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Sep 1, 10 - 11:26 AM
Democrats attack Rossi's "sleazy" lobbyist ties

Sep 1, 10 - 11:14 AM
Rossi praises Obama on Iraq; Murray relatively quiet

Aug 31, 10 - 6:42 PM
GOP star Sen. Scott Brown stumps for Rossi in Bellevue

Aug 30, 10 - 12:10 PM
Follow the money

Aug 27, 10 - 8:08 PM
State Sen. Jean Berkey asks PDC to set aside election results

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

Contributors

Jim Brunner
Covers politics.

Keith Ervin
Covers King County government.

Lillian Tucker
Covers the Legislature.

Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.

Emily Heffter
Covers Seattle City Hall.

Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.

Kyung Song
Covers politics and regional issues from Washington, D.C.