Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Go to the politics section for more local and national politics coverage.

Politics Northwest

The Seattle Times political team explores national, state and local politics.

March 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Sen. Eide sticks to her guns on cellphone bill

Posted by Lillian Tucker

Sen. Tracey Eide reinforced her message Saturday that using a cellphone while behind the wheel is dangerous -- for drivers of any age -- and that laws prohibiting it need to have a backbone.

She led the Senate on Saturday morning to reject the House's amendment to SB 6345 - regarding the use of cellphones by Washington motorists -- and has asked the representatives to annul their change to her bill.

The original measure sought to ban young drivers from using their cellphone -- handheld or hands-free -- and to make violations of cellphone traffic laws for all ages a primary offense. It passed the Senate 33-15.

Under current law, hand-held cellphone use and texting is banned for all drivers but may only be enforced as a secondary offense, meaning that police must have another reason -- such as speeding -- to stop motorists and fine them $124 for illegal cellphone use.

Rep. Dan Roach, R-Bonney Lake, and other members of the House were not comfortable Wednesday with Sen. Eide's effort to strengthen the law.

They passed an amendment keeping handheld-cellphone use by adults a secondary offense while making it a primary offense for those same drivers to text and for teen motorists to use the devices at all.

The House approved the changed bill 86-12. It was sent back to the Senate for consideration.

"This is an extreme safety issue," said Sen. Eide, D-Federal Way, in reaction to the House's decision Wednesday. "It is a long way from being done."

Spurning the amendment, the Senate threw the bill back to the House on Saturday --making this showdown far from over.

From here the House can: 1) take back the amendment, 2) refuse to do so and again ask the Senate to accept the change or 3) ask for a public conference where members from both sides can try to reach an agreement.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Browse the archives

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

Contributors

Jim Brunner
Covers politics.

Keith Ervin
Covers the Eastside.

Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.

Emily Heffter
Covers local government.

Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.

Kyung Song
Covers politics and regional issues from Washington, D.C.

Lynn Thompson
Covers Seattle City Hall.

Bob Young
Covers King County and urban affairs.