Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Go to the politics section for more local and national politics coverage.

Politics Northwest

The Seattle Times political team explores national, state and local politics.

February 3, 2010 at 3:37 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Two years to design 520 transit lanes? Backers say state can go faster

Posted by Mike Lindblom

Neighborhood groups in Seattle dispute Gov. Chris Gregoire's assertion that a new bridge would be delayed 18 to 24 months, if the state were to take their advice and redesign the carpool lanes to be exclusively for high-capacity bus and rail.

The group issued a letter calling the transit-only lanes "a minimal change," because existing state law already requires that a new bridge be able to carry bus-rapid transit and eventually light rail.

Gregoire herself insisted in January 2008 that the bridge be buoyant enough, or could be modified, to support trains someday (four railcars can weigh up to 200 tons). The long-term strategy was left ambiguous. But two years ago, some neighbors declared that rail should replace the HOV lanes, instead of causing the bridge to be widened. In other words "six means six," a similar stance to the one declared by neighbors and area legislators this week.

"Construction of all six lanes [of 520] could start as soon as conceptual agreement is reached. So with goodwill, the project could move ahead promptly," argues the letter by Fran Conley, co-coordinator for Coalition for a Sustainable SR 520, and co-signed by leaders of the Sierra Club and Cascade Bicycle Club.

And in the case of the Alaskan Way tunnel proposal, the state changed course in a few weeks to ditch surface and elevated "hybrid" options and become convinced to seek a bored tunnel, in December 2008.

But it's not engineering so much as legal rules that would cause delays of up to two years for 520, by forcing changes in the environmental impact statement, the governor said in her letter to the City Council this week.

Transit would still use any carpool lanes, as is done by express buses throughout the region.

The neighborhood groups are hoping transit-only lanes would allow for smaller ramps at a Montlake Interchange, or at least, limit the overall car traffic entering Seattle.

A new pontoon construction plan, by the state Department of Transportation says the six-lane bridge can be retrofitted in the future for rail, by adding "supplemental stability pontoons" below deck.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

Contributors

Jim Brunner
Covers politics.

Keith Ervin
Covers the Eastside.

Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.

Emily Heffter
Covers local government.

Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.

Kyung Song
Covers politics and regional issues from Washington, D.C.

Lynn Thompson
Covers Seattle City Hall.

Bob Young
Covers King County and urban affairs.