Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Politics Northwest

The Seattle Times political team explores national, state and local politics.

Blog Home | RSS feeds Subscribe

September 1, 2009 at 3:00 PM

Comments (16)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Constantine, Hutchison back "everything but marriage" law

Posted by Bob Young

In the race for King County executive, Dow Constantine has tried to paint Susan Hutchison as a conservative whose values are out of sync with local voters.

But when it comes to Referendum 71, the November referendum on the state's "everything but marriage" law, Constantine and Hutchison agree.

They both want to keep the law, which grants a wide range of benefits to same-sex couples, in place.

Constantine sent out a statement Monday evening after the Secretary of State's office announced that backers of R-71, who want to overturn the state law, appeared to have collected enough signatures to put the referendum on the ballot.

"Everyone in a free society must have the same rights: for that reason I invite people across Washington State to join me in working to support the passage of Referendum 71," Constantine said in his statement. A "yes" vote would retain the law.

Hutchison did not issue a similar public statement. But Jordan McCarren, her campaign manager, said "she does not wish to overturn the law" and that Hutchison would vote in November to keep it in place.

McCarren went on to say Hutchison is "perfectly happy" to make her views known but he doesn't expect her to campaign for the law, saying it's not directly relevant to the county executive's job.

Bill Dubay, a longtime gay activist and county employee, said he was pleased to hear about Hutchison's stance.

"Good for her. We need all the candidates running any place in this state to clearly state the outcome they desire," Dubay said.

Clearly stating that desired outcome can be tricky for candidates because of how a referendum works.

Backers of R-71, meaning those have worked to put it on the ballot and repeal that law's benefits, want voters to mark "no" on their ballots. Those who want to keep the law would vote "yes."

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

retract that last comment. I see what he's saying...referenda vs. initiatives can be confusing...  Posted on September 1, 2009 at 3:40 PM by Spanish Johnny. Jump to comment
Referendum 71 will ask voters to reject or approve the domestic partnership law. Vote "APPROVED" on Ref. 71 to preserve the domestic...  Posted on September 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM by Lurleen. Jump to comment
Ms Hutchison's spoeksman can say anything he wants, I'd like to hear it from her lips. It would be interesting to find out if she signed...  Posted on September 1, 2009 at 8:02 PM by DeepBIue. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Feb 9, 10 - 8:37 PM
Husky Stadium, Safeco Field cut out of tax plan... for now

Feb 9, 10 - 12:31 PM
High-speed rail: spend $50 billion?

Feb 8, 10 - 8:23 PM
Report spells out tuition increases under Senate bill

Feb 8, 10 - 6:08 PM
Gregoire wants more clarity on school funding case

Feb 8, 10 - 4:50 PM
Senate Ways and Means passes bill that would ease way for tax increases

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

Contributors

Jim Brunner
Covers politics.

Keith Ervin
Covers King County government.

Lillian Tucker
Covers the Legislature.

Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.

Emily Heffter
Covers Seattle City Hall.

Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.