Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Election 2010


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Tuesday, September 7, 2010 at 6:37 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Judge tosses state's limit on late campaign spending

State officials are mulling their next steps after a federal judge overturned a Washington law limiting campaign contributions in the final weeks of ballot-measure campaigns.

The Associated Press

Follow the latest stories and blog updates of politics across the Puget Sound region or check out our national politics coverage.

OLYMPIA — State officials are mulling their next steps after a federal judge overturned a Washington law limiting campaign contributions in the final weeks of ballot-measure campaigns.

If the ruling were to stand, money could flow even more freely to this year's crop of voter initiatives. Six such measures are on the ballot — the second-most in state history — and state records show the campaigns have raised a combined $32.5 million, with about $10.1 million spent so far.

The law at issue bans contributions larger than $5,000 in the final three weeks of an initiative or referendum campaign. Family PAC, a political group involved in the 2009 referendum on expanded domestic partnerships for gay couples, sued the state last year challenging the contribution limit.

In a ruling last week, U.S. District Judge Ronald Leighton in Tacoma agreed with Family PAC that the limit was an unconstitutional infringement on political speech. But Leighton kept in place a requirement to identify donors who contribute more than $25, turning aside Family PAC's argument that such publicity might improperly dissuade people from giving to campaigns.

James Bopp Jr., a noted campaign-finance attorney who represented Family PAC, said the Washington state spending limit clearly violated the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and political association.

"That includes the freedom to make contributions in support of political causes they want to advance," Bopp said Tuesday. "Now the people of Washington will be able to do what the First Amendment allows and protects."

State officials hadn't yet decided whether to appeal Leighton's ruling. But Janelle Guthrie, spokeswoman for state Attorney General Rob McKenna, said Leighton's support of the donor-reporting law was "a victory for accountability in campaign finance and the public's right to know who is financing our elections."

The state Public Disclosure Commission, which enforces Washington's campaign-spending laws, was closed for cost-saving furloughs and Tuesday unavailable for comment.

Family PAC is part of a socially conservative Lynnwood group called the Family Policy Institute of Washington.

Family PAC was created just after last year's legal deadline for large campaign contributions had passed. The committee said it had an offer for a large donation to finance political ads but couldn't accept the money because of the state law.

Referendum 71 asked voters to either keep or reject the "everything but marriage" expansion of domestic partnerships for gay couples in the state. It was approved last fall with 53 percent of the vote.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Politics

Others states' fights bring focus to Daniels

NEW - 07:13 AM
South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley is writing memoir

Bill would make jail mug shots available

Immigration, license bill voted down in state Senate

Rival Texas bills require sonograms before abortions

More Politics headlines...

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

advertising


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising