Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Politics & Government


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Monday, December 29, 2008 at 12:00 AM

Comments (16)     E-mail article     Print view

Legislator to push again for testing DNA of suspects

Rep. Mark Miloscia, D-Federal Way, says he plans to introduce a bill in the 2009 Legislature that will put the state on the same page with the federal government on the subject of DNA testing.

TACOMA — Rep. Mark Miloscia, D-Federal Way, says he plans to introduce a bill in the 2009 Legislature that will put the state on the same page with the federal government on the subject of DNA testing.

In January, federal authorities will start collecting DNA samples from everyone they arrest on felony charges.

Miloscia sponsored a state bill in 2005 that was much like the new federal law that will take effect Jan. 9. The Legislature gets under way Jan. 12.

"We take their fingerprints, their pictures and their address when they are arrested," Miloscia said. "What's wrong with taking their DNA? We would throw their DNA away if they aren't convicted."

Miloscia's 2005 proposal said DNA for arrested felons would be destroyed if charges were dropped or if the suspect were found not guilty, and their markers would be removed from the database maintained by the State Patrol.

Currently, Washington law requires collection of DNA samples only from convicted criminals, not from all who are arrested for felony crimes. DNA collection also is required for a smattering of lesser offenses — generally sex crimes. But again, those samples are taken only after conviction.

Miloscia's 2005 bill never got beyond a public hearing in a House committee, and Miloscia acknowledged the 2009 prospects are not good because of economic implications. The state faces an estimated $5.7 billion deficit.

But Miloscia said he believes a majority of the Legislature's members will see things his way once the state's budget problems are behind them.

Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said cost isn't the only reason Miloscia's bill should not be passed into law. He thinks it would intrude too much on individual privacy.

"It's not an obvious slam-dunk," Kline said. "The public has an interest on both sides of this question — in catching the bad guys and in protecting the privacy of the good guys."

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Politics headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
I totally agree with RoyalScotsHighlander. This should never make it past committee. Can anyone spell Insurance Companies? And anyone who thinks...  Posted on December 29, 2008 at 12:26 PM by BikerVet. Jump to comment
"Does passing a law that all people that are arrested must have their DNA collected and sent to the lab bypass the need for voluntarily giving...  Posted on December 29, 2008 at 8:24 AM by Bo Lasquis. Jump to comment
"I guess this legistlator hasnt confered with the Constitution regarding unreasonable search and seizure. Even more amazing he;s...  Posted on December 29, 2008 at 6:21 AM by Bo Lasquis. Jump to comment

advertising

UPDATE - 10:26 PM
Palin links resignation to 'higher calling'

Palin links resignation to 'higher calling' and blasts media in Facebook posting

Despite latest uptick, second half of year doesn't look that promising

2 US troops die in attack on base in Afghanistan

Iranian hardliner calls Mousavi U.S. agent

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising