Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Politics & Government


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Monday, March 3, 2008 at 12:00 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Senate leader to sue over I-960 provisions

Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown said Sunday she will sue in a bid to overturn the tax-limiting provisions of Initiative 960, a Tim Eyman-sponsored...

The Associated Press

OLYMPIA — Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown said Sunday she will sue in a bid to overturn the tax-limiting provisions of Initiative 960, a Tim Eyman-sponsored measure aimed at curbing the Legislature's power to raise taxes.

The lawsuit, which is technically against Lt. Gov. Brad Owen over a Senate floor ruling upholding I-960, will be filed this morning with the state Supreme Court.

Initiative 960 reaffirmed higher vote thresholds for tax increases and was passed by voters in November. It requires all state tax increases to achieve at least a two-thirds vote in both houses. That was previously mandated by Initiative 601, passed in 1993, which lawmakers have amended and even suspended at times. Under the initiative, taxes passed with only a simple majority have to go to the ballot for ratification.

Brown told The Associated Press on Sunday the two-thirds requirement is "clearly unconstitutional."

"This isn't about 960, and this isn't about undoing the will of the people," Brown said. "This is about defending the Constitution and the Legislature's ability to pass laws under the Constitution."

Brown said they are asking the court for an expedited ruling. If that's not granted, she said, they are asking that they rule before the 2009 legislative session.

Eyman said Democrats are upset their ability to raise taxes has been hindered.

"It is the topic that chafes," Eyman said. "They don't like that voters said they want it to be harder to raise taxes."

Brown said it's not about taxes, it's about upholding the Constitution. She noted the lawsuit doesn't address any other aspect of I-960, such as votes on fees and the public-notification process.

Eyman opponents, including legislators, believe I-960 is illegal because it conflicts with the state Constitution's provision that the Legislature can pass bills with a simple majority. The initiative shouldn't be allowed to alter that requirement, the argument goes, because it wasn't a constitutional amendment.

Eyman said that there is nothing in the state Constitution that prevents voters or the Legislature from raising the threshold for passing a tax bill.

"The Legislature should be spending more time living by the laws the people have set forth rather than circumventing them," he said.

advertising

Brown laid the groundwork for the lawsuit Friday, when she asked Owen to rule I-960 unconstitutional for the purposes of a pending vote on a proposed $10 million liquor increase that would pay for drunken-driving enforcement and substance-abuse treatment.

Under I-960, the bill would have required approval from two-thirds of the Senate.

In his ruling, Owen said Brown's arguments are "cogent and persuasive" but that it was up to the courts to decide the constitutionality of I-960. He also ruled the proposed tax increase did meet the thresholds in I-960, and would require a two-thirds vote.

The tax increase then got a simple majority vote of 25-21, but was defeated because supporters couldn't get the 33 votes needed.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

Obama warns of 'difficult' days in Iraq, pledges support for troops

Minority GOP gets creative to flex muscle

Palin links resignation to 'higher calling' and blasts media in Facebook posting

Despite latest uptick, second half of year doesn't look that promising

Eyman initiative looks likely for November ballot

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising