Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Monday, July 6, 2009 at 12:00 AM

Comments (7)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Guest columnists

Compensate Pend Oreille County for impacts of Seattle City Light's Boundary Dam

Seattle City Light should compensate Pend Oreille County for the impacts of its Boundary Dam, write the commissioners of the Northeast Washington county.

Special to the Times

WHEN we travel to Seattle and look at the impressive skyline at night we see a little bit of Pend Oreille County in the glow. We live 300 miles away, but we're the place where almost half of the energy that lights up Seattle comes from.

That's us, in the upper right hand corner of the state, just below Canada and west of Idaho. Our county has hosted Seattle City Light's Boundary Dam since it was licensed and built nearly 50 years ago.

We've been a bit ambivalent about Boundary Dam ever since. There was a big fight between City Light and Pend Oreille County Public Utility District about who would get the license to build a dam on that site. Our utility lost.

The dam and its big power lines have had real impacts on Pend Oreille County. It has affected our fisheries and recreation. On the other hand, Boundary reminds us every day that we're an important part of an amazing electrical system that serves our region well and provides for several Pend Oreille County families.

Every 10 years, our county commission and City Light have negotiated a compensation agreement because, as a public agency, City Light does not pay property taxes — the lifeblood of county government. Past agreements have come and gone without too much discussion, but times have changed and the dam's impact, the market and the economy are all different. So when City Light came along with the new agreement at the end of last year, we vowed to take a hard look at it.

What we found has caused us to reject City Light's proposal, take the first steps to change the state law that governs host-community agreements, and prepare to intervene in the federal relicensing of Boundary Dam.

We compared the financial benefits of a new wind project to what City Light would provide to our county through its proposal. We were amazed to find that wind projects bring counties who host them $5,000 to $10,000 in property taxes for each installed megawatt. City Light's proposal is just a bit more than $1,000 for each megawatt of capacity.

We compared what a private utility would pay in property taxes if it owned Boundary Dam. We found it would pay three times more than what City Light proposes. We pursued the tax question further and found that City Light had contributed just $1,000 a year in sales taxes to our county during the past five years.

We discovered that the financial value of Boundary Dam had changed as the Western energy market deregulated. Before deregulation, Boundary power was used in just a handful of energy transactions. Ten years after, however, the Western electricity market is home to hundreds of thousands of trades for many different kinds of services.

With Boundary as the engine, City Light's wholesale revenues average $160 million a year the past five years. That money goes to lower rates and pay off debt in Seattle. We think a little bit of that money should fairly compensate our county, where the power is produced.

The fair thing to do is to move levels of compensation to host counties to match what new wind projects create and we've proposed a way to implement it gradually. If we can do that, then we'd feel a little better about seeing that Pend Oreille County glow in the night sky above Elliott Bay.

Diane Wear, John Hankey and Laura Merrill are Pend Oreille County commissioners.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Opinion headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Comments (7)
Excuse me, Seattle built your high school. You seem to have forgotten that part. Is there any legal employment in Pend Oreille County other than...  Posted on July 6, 2009 at 6:30 AM by ratcityreprobate. Jump to comment
They should be paid what City Light is paying everyone else. That's pretty darned fair. The days of the rest of the state kowtowing to the...  Posted on July 6, 2009 at 9:48 PM by Pickupguy. Jump to comment
This matter should be settled by an independent arbiter right now it seems like the county gets what the Seattle Light Company wants to give them...  Posted on July 10, 2009 at 8:12 AM by froude. Jump to comment


Get home delivery today!

More Opinion

NEW - 04:27 PM
E.J. Dionne / Syndicated columnist: Disrupting the Tea Party: Why the government-haters lost in Maine and Washington

NEW - 04:28 PM
Guest columnist: Beyond Veterans Day: Make sure U.S. takes care of its veterans

Paul Krugman / Syndicated Columnist: Right-wing paranoia getting out of hand

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: A tragic clash of cultures

David Sirota / Syndicated columnist: Trade and globalization: We are what we buy and how we buy it

Advertising

Video

Pelosi answers questions at Swedish Medical Center
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi answers questions after addressing the media at Swedish Medical Center regarding health care.

Pelosi speaks at Swedish Medical Center
"Pistol" Pete Ryan
Mourners gather at KeyArena for slain officer's memorial
Procession for slain SPD officer
Election Night: Approve R-71
Election Night: Reject R-71
Election Night: Mike McGinn
Election Night: Joe Mallahan
Election Night: Susan Hutchison

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising