Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Tuesday, June 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM

Comments (15)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Guest columnist

Nuclear power should not be blindly dismissed as part of total energy solution

Passion for totally clean energy should be tempered by pragmatism and consideration of facts that include power demand and reliability of energy sources, writes Sid Morrison, chairman of Energy Northwest's executive board and a former congressman. Nuclear energy might be part of solution.

Special to The Times

PASSION for an ideal, like totally clean energy, can be powerful and contagious, blindingly so.

Such passion has convinced some people we can meet all our future electric-energy needs in the Northwest with nothing more than conservation and renewable energy sources. That utopian dream ignores the necessity for baseload or full-time power sources, including carbon-free nuclear power, to back up intermittent power sources like wind and solar power.

Conservation and renewable-energy sources are an essential and responsible part of the answer to our future energy needs; they just aren't the whole solution.

While conservation is undeniably the cleanest, fastest, cheapest and best way to offset new power demand, the law of diminishing returns clearly applies. We simply can't conserve our way out of the need for more power to meet future needs.

In the Northwest, renewable energy really means wind power, and to a lesser degree solar and biomass — at least until major improvements in wave, tidal, geothermal and other technologies are achieved. The intermittent nature of wind and solar power is a real problem. On-again/off-again power destabilizes the regional transmission grid through dramatic power swings created by changing weather conditions.

The challenge of meeting all our power needs with conservation and renewables becomes greater if we commit to electrifying any meaningful portion of our transportation system — an initiative we may have to pursue to meet our state's carbon-emissions targets.

Fortunately, organizations like Energy Northwest, successfully operating the state's one nuclear reactor, are working diligently to provide a mix of carbon-free electric-power options to avoid needlessly limiting our options and gambling our economic future in the process.

According to the Bonneville Power Administration, the present average regional power load is about 26,000 megawatts. We can expect regional demand to grow by 2,000 to 3,000 megawatts over the next four to five years. Demand can easily rise 10 to 15 percent over the several years it takes to permit and build a substantial power-generation facility.

So, by all means continue to implement conservation and support all the wind, biomass, solar, geothermal, wave and tidal power that can be brought online.

But realize we can't stop there. We must also have full-time baseload power generation to back up intermittent renewable-power sources to ensure we have power when the wind is not blowing and the sun is not shining.

In Washington, the two realistic options available today for full-time baseload power are natural gas and nuclear power.

Tired attempts to link commercial nuclear power to vastly overblown cost and risk factors and defense wastes are irresponsible. Used commercial nuclear fuel is a valuable commodity that can be recycled, as is the routine in many of the world's nuclear-energy countries. Approximately 95 percent of the used fuel in every commercial reactor can be recycled safely, thereby reducing dependence on foreign energy sources and minimizing the need for new uranium mines.

Washington's economy eventually will return to full force and continue to strengthen. It will take multiple sources of power, perhaps all the options available to ensure reliable, affordable, environmentally responsible power is available to grow a vibrant regional economy.

Our state needs informed citizens working with legislators and industry to meet our future power demands and carbon-emission goals. It is imperative we all set aside our individual passions and biases long enough to objectively assess our options. Become your own best source of factual information on energy issues. Challenge assertions and fear mongering by doing your own research. Question your own paradigms about energy policy and the various technologies.

Failing to seriously consider the safe, carbon-free commercial nuclear-power option could be the first sign of a well-intended passion blinding your objectivity.

Sid Morrison is chairman of Energy Northwest's executive board. Previously, he was a congressman, state lawmaker and Washington's secretary of transportation.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Opinion headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Comments (15)
We need to move towards molten salt reactors, such as the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR), to address the so-called waste issue. Also,...  Posted on July 1, 2009 at 7:56 AM by Arcs_n_Sparks. Jump to comment
It is my understanding that the Porkulus Bill (Obamanites call it the Stimulus Bill) could have built 8-9 large nuclear power plants in the US,...  Posted on July 1, 2009 at 7:58 AM by Redmonder. Jump to comment
"Three Mile Island was not a disaster, it had a problem and the safety protocols were followed to shut it down. No disaster here."...  Posted on July 1, 2009 at 10:14 AM by Bo Lasquis. Jump to comment


Get home delivery today!

More Opinion

NEW - 03:17 PM
E.J. Dionne / Syndicated columnist: Obama's 'third way' in Afghanistan: neither Iraq nor Vietnam

NEW - 03:17 PM
Guest columnist: Turning to a new chapter in Afghanistan

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: New York terror trials will restore faith in rule of law

Neal Peirce / Syndicated columnist: It's time to promote development that conserves land and energy

Guest columnist: Ringing the alarm about a threat to homeless youth

Advertising

Video

Real Salt Lake wins MLS Cup
Real Salt Lake defeated the Los Angeles Galaxy with penalty kicks after 120 minutes of play at Qwest Field in Seattle.

Raw Video | Real Salt Lake receives the MLS Cup trophy
Raw Video | Real Salt Lake fans celebrate
Real Salt Lake fans enter Qwest Field
Raw Video | MLS Cup Opening Ceremony
LA Galaxy's David Beckham
Real Salt Lake's Kyle Beckerman
MLS trophy arrives in Seattle
Chittenden Locks Inspection
Full interview with New Moon actors

Marketplace

Advertising