Originally published June 5, 2009 at 5:02 PM | Page modified June 5, 2009 at 5:10 PM
Comments (5)
E-mail article
Print view
Share
Guest columnist
Major institutions should not be immune from Seattle's pedestrian-friendly municipal code
Seattle's Municipal Codes intend to encourage a lively, safe pedestrian environment, writes guest columnist Sharon Egretta Sutton. But a loophole lets large institutions build without the same scrutiny other builders must go through.
Special to The Times
SEATTLE'S Municipal Code ensures a lively, safe pedestrian environment by regulating the uses and amount of blank walls that line city streets.
These laws are enforced, in part, during public meetings when review boards recommend or reject proposed designs. However, projects built by major institutions are exempt from public review due to a bargain struck in the1980s, when the city traded design regulation of large institutions for an agreement that they not expand into surrounding neighborhoods.
The difference between the review process for major institutions and everybody else means that these institutions are exempt from a process that safeguards pedestrian concerns, as two projects in my neighborhood illustrate.
One project, affordable housing for formerly homeless families designed by Roderick A. Butler for Catholic Community Services (CCS), recently underwent a second public review after a two-year effort to secure financing. Located at 100 23rd Ave. S. in the Central District, the project would be built in CCS's existing parking lot.
Butler argued that the project's economic feasibility required parking at grade within the new structure, a strategy that meant a blank wall fronting 24th Street, which would not meet code requirements for transparent, occupied uses along city streets. While acknowledging the project's worthiness, the board, myself included, rejected Butler's argument, requiring that he redesign the façade to create a more pedestrian-friendly environment.
Later that evening, I viewed the construction site of a second project, the Virginia Mason Medical Center expansion, from my apartment window. This building deviates from the Municipal Code on a much larger scale than the project I had just rejected, but as a large hospital, Virginia Mason is exempt from public review.
The hospital's Web site promises that the building design will marry the hospital's need for efficiency with the public's desire for a safe, pleasant pedestrian experience. The accompanying images indicate a transparent base, blank façades limited to the second and third floors, and a band of large windows wrapping the fourth floor.
However, the building rising on the west side of Boren Avenue between Spring and Seneca streets is almost solid concrete. At pedestrian level, the Boren façade is 76 percent blank, the Seneca façade 100 percent blank, both departing from code requirements. If parking is situated behind these walls, the building will further depart from code.
Particularly disturbing is the 131-foot-long concrete wall that begins on Boren and continues around the corner onto Seneca for the entire 116-foot length of the structure.
So far, the project suggests a concrete fortress. The 206-foot-long base along Boren averages 24 feet high and is about 82 percent solid concrete; the 116-foot-long base along Seneca averages 35 feet high and is about 79 percent solid concrete. These are optimistic estimates because some openings could be closed with garage doors.
In all fairness, the hospital was responsive to public opposition during the planning stages, reducing the building height from 240 feet to 145 feet. But the design itself was exempt from the public review that Butler's affordable housing must undergo.
As part of a large institution, the expansion, designed by NBBJ, was subject only to review by a citizen's advisory committee. I serve on such a committee for Swedish Medical Center and can attest to the token role these committees play. For example, the Swedish committee debated another NBBJ design at length, only to learn that the new facility was already approved.
Seattle's design review process intends that no project, no matter how worthy, will rise above the law. But without public scrutiny, buildings such as the Virginia Mason Medical Center expansion can evade regulations that ensure a lively pedestrian environment.
Sharon Egretta Sutton is a professor of architecture and urban design at the University of Washington, and a fellow in the American Institute of Architects. She chairs the Area 7 Design Review Board.Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: New York terror trials will restore faith in rule of law
Joni Balter / Seattle Times editorial columnist: Our team in D.C. — Locke, Sims and Kerlikowske
Guest columnist: A way to get around Karzai in Afghanistan
Ryan Blethen / Times editorial columnist: Block NBC/Comcast deal to protect consumer choice
Charles Krauthammer / Syndicated columnist: New York trial a propaganda coup for terrrorists

LA Galaxy's David Beckham
Los Angeles Galaxy's David Beckham talks about the upcoming MLS Cup final during after a team practice.
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Craigslist adoption ad: A plea by young mother-to-be? A scam?
- Italian lead prosecutor argues Knox motive was hatred
- Tugboat sinks on Seattle's waterfront
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Italian prosecutors request life sentence for UW student
- Man shot in chest on E. Union Street in Capitol Hill
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
- Mariners Blog | A Mariners-Tigers swap makes a whole lot of sense for both teams
- Senate vote clears hurdle
239 - Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
120 - Tight Senate vote launches health care over hurdle
119 - Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
118 - Palin excitement builds in Tri-Cities
116 - Cutting through breast-cancer confusion
89 - Prosecutor requests life in prison for Amanda Knox
88 - Game thread
70 - New York terror trials will restore faith in rule of law
53 - Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
48
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Nonprofits get creative using Twitter and Facebook to make donation easier
- It's possible to recover a life lost to hoarding
- Lynnwood is reinventing itself — again
- Great places to cross-country ski for free (or almost) in the Methow
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Recipes: Sesame Pork Roast, Sour Cream Mashed Potatoes, Gingerbread with Lemon Sauce and more
- Banff: powder, peaks & purity
- 175 foster kids in Washington get 'forever families'









