Originally published October 1, 2008 at 12:00 AM | Page modified November 7, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Comments (0)
E-mail article
Print view
Guest columnist
Pending Yahoo-Google deal will stifle choice, competition
You may be one of the dwindling number of Americans who prefer newspapers to the Internet. But regardless of your information source, you...
Special to The Times
The Democracy Papers is a series of articles, essays and editorial opinion examining threats to our freedoms of speech. Technology has created space for more voices, yet fewer and fewer are heard.
The American press and media are being decimated by consolidation. This transformation from many owners into five or six large corporations and the lessening of small outlets for radio, newspapers, magazines and music are chilling a once robust marketplace of ideas. What should Americans do? This series explores the arguments and the backlash.
Democracy Papers online archive:
www.seattletimes/thedemocracypapers
Daily Democracy, the Democracy Papers blog: blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/dailydemocracy.
You may be one of the dwindling number of Americans who prefer newspapers to the Internet. But regardless of your information source, you should know about the pending Google-Yahoo deal now afloat in cyberspace.
These two firms are the dominant providers of Internet search engines, the tool that facilitates online searches for information or for a product or service. Google has roughly 70 percent of the search-engine market; Yahoo has roughly 20 percent (Microsoft and a few other firms share the remaining 10 percent). Search engines are triggered when the user types in a key word or phrase. To make money from these Internet search tools, the firms sell advertising on the search sites.
John Wanamaker, who more than a century ago pioneered department-store ads, complained that he was wasting half his advertising dollars. "The trouble is," he said, "I don't know which half."
Search advertising offers an answer. A search engine provides a list of results on one side of the page and, usually above and to the right of this list, targeted ads for the very item being researched. The advertiser pays each time an Internet user clicks on the ad.
Because of its ability to home in on interested buyers, this is one of the most powerful and rapidly growing forms of Internet advertising. In 2007, roughly $8.6 billion was spent on search ads in the United States.
The pending deal will allow Yahoo to post on its site ads that sellers place with Google. In return, Google will compensate Yahoo Both firms expect to make money from this arrangement. Advertisers that buy Google search advertising will potentially reach larger numbers of customers — those using either firm's search engine. So everyone will benefit, right?
Not so fast. In fact, important buyers of advertising oppose the arrangement. They say it will reduce competition, offering buyers of search ads fewer choices at higher prices. The opportunity to shop between the two large firms may be effectively lost — Yahoo will have little incentive to place a seller's ad on its search sites if a Google ad will offer a higher return.
Yahoo's president has conceded as much (Yahoo will use Google's ads when they "monetize" better). Yahoo may be unhappy with its 20 percent market share — and happy to charge higher prices for the ads it does run — but this leaves advertisers with fewer choices and higher ad costs to pass on to consumers.
The importance of continued competition is heightened because this industry operates with a high degree of secrecy. The advertiser gets to make a bid in an auction to determine whose ad gets favorable placement. It's not, however, a public auction. The advertisers don't know what factors are weighed in a placement decision — only the search-engine firm knows this information.
The pernicious effects of this secrecy might be mitigated if search-engine providers aggressively compete through price and non-price offerings. If the deal to cooperatively sell ads goes through, the incentives for hard-nosed competition would be dampened. Worse, the essential terms of the pending deal that could affect these incentives have not been disclosed. That, too, remains a secret.
The Justice Department's Antitrust Division is investigating this deal and has taken the unusual step of hiring an outside consultant — former Antitrust Division chief Sanford J. Litvack (who served during the Carter presidency) — to assist it. Whatever the Antitrust Division decides, its analysis should be revealed so that advertisers, consumers and antitrust experts can fairly evaluate the decision.
The Antitrust Division's record in making meaningful disclosure has been unsatisfactory, particularly when a decision is made to drop an investigation of a planned merger or joint venture. That's not good government, especially in a high-stakes arrangement between the two most powerful and collectively dominant firms in Internet searches.
Law professor Warren S. Grimes (wgrimes@swlaw.edu) teaches at Southwestern University School of Law in Los Angeles, Calif. He chairs the Los Angeles County Bar Association Antitrust and Trade Regulation Section and serves on the advisory board of the American Antitrust Institute. Reprinted with permission of the Daily Journal Corp. (2008).
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
E-mail article
Print view Share:
Digg
Newsvine
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: New York terror trials will restore faith in rule of law
Neal Peirce / Syndicated columnist: It's time to promote development that conserves land and energy
Guest columnist: Ringing the alarm about a threat to homeless youth
Joni Balter / Seattle Times editorial columnist: Our team in D.C. — Locke, Sims and Kerlikowske
Guest columnist: A way to get around Karzai in Afghanistan
Real Salt Lake wins MLS Cup
Real Salt Lake defeated the Los Angeles Galaxy with penalty kicks after 120 minutes of play at Qwest Field in Seattle.
shopping
events for Monday, Nov. 23
- Fall/Winter Sale at Clover
- Holiday Sale at Pink Ginger
- Cicada Bridal Party Dress Sale
- Capers November Sale
editors' picks
More shopping guides- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Tugboat sinks at Seattle waterfront pier
- Illegal workers quietly let go
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
- Craigslist adoption ad: A plea by young mother-to-be? A scam?
- Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
- Woman stabbed by stranger in North Seattle
- Snow piles up on Cascade slopes
- Denny Triangle gains skyline, but tenants slow to come
- Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
148 - Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
132 - Palin excitement builds in Tri-Cities
129 - Tight Senate vote launches health care over hurdle
124 - Illegal workers quietly let go
111 - Cutting through breast-cancer confusion
102 - Historic health care bill clears Senate hurdle
90 - Game thread
70 - New York terror trials will restore faith in rule of law
69 - Climate change speeds up since 1997 Kyoto accord
58
- Sprouts, raw fish on attorney's 'do not eat' list
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Illegal workers quietly let go
- It's possible to recover a life lost to hoarding
- Food-safety lawyer's wish: Put me out of business
- Rediscovering Moab, 'the most beautiful place on Earth'
- Tattoos at Mill Creek church pierce skin, soul
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Architects, chefs find 'kid' within to build Gingerbread Village





