Originally published Tuesday, September 23, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Guest columnist
Training — not age — the key to making teens great drivers
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has issued a report calling on states to raise the minimum driving age to 17 or 18. While I share the...
Special to The Times
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has issued a report calling on states to raise the minimum driving age to 17 or 18. While I share the IIHS's concern over the staggering number of 16-year-olds — as well as 17-, 18- and 19-years-olds — who are injured or killed in car collisions every year, I disagree that the problem is age.
With up-to-date driver training, more hours of careful behind-the-wheel practice and effective parental involvement and role modeling, 16-year-olds can be excellent drivers.
Many of us remember drivers ed as a combination of tedious classes, outdated films and unnerving behind-the-wheel sessions. The instructors were usually our shop teachers, our coaches or whoever could be talked into doing the job.
We learned the shapes and colors of road signs; we learned how to brake without making everything fall off the dashboard; we learned the skills we needed to pass the road test and get a license.
But we weren't taught to master the complex, demanding skills that a life of collision-free driving requires. We certainly weren't challenged to think very hard about how we would handle peer pressure or avoid common risks.
The basic structure and content of drivers education in the United States has not changed since it was first developed in the Eisenhower administration, so it's no surprise that the rate of teen-driving fatalities has not decreased since then. Our roads are much more complex today than they were 50 years ago. We're preparing 21st-century teens to drive in a mid-20th-century world.
It's not that age — more precisely, inexperience — doesn't play a role in the number of 16-year-olds involved in collisions. But effective training and parent involvement can greatly reduce those statistics. Parents generally are very lenient in the first few months when it comes to placing restrictions on their teen's driving. Ninety percent of parents allow their new teen driver to drive in the dark. Seventy-seven percent allow their teen to drive with friends in the car.
Yet, according to a 2002 A. James McKnight study referenced in the Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, driving in the dark and driving with friends are two of the top four behavioral and environmental factors contributing to teen crashes. The other two are distractions and weather.
Well-intentioned parents place some restrictions on their teen's driving but not necessarily the ones that will keep their teen safe. Parents have misconceptions about what the real risk factors are.
A 2005 study conducted by the Allstate Foundation found that parents believe the top risk to be impairment due to alcohol or drugs. The McKnight study, however, found that the No. 1 contributing factor in teen car collisions — almost a quarter of them — is distractions: talking on a cellphone, texting, eating, changing the radio station and all the other activities teens engage in when they should be focused on driving.
Impairment due to alcohol and drugs was the No. 1 contributor in only 2.4 percent of car collisions involving 16-year-old drivers.
I recently attended a driving class. The teacher asked the students to respond in writing to this statement:
"There is no point in trying to teach responsibility to young drivers; they lack the judgment and experience to make good decisions."
Here's a sampling of the teens' answers:
• "If adults put time into helping kids drive rather than ranting about them, then kids would learn how to make good decisions and drive well."
• "They are stereotyping all kids into one group."
• "Young drivers, nervous and new to driving, probably feel more responsible than people who drive every day."
• "Adult drivers feel they can have coffee and talk on the phone while driving."
• "Adults assume we lack the ability to make good decisions and, therefore, don't teach us the important things required to make good decisions."
I spent a good part of a recent Tuesday listening to talk-show hosts and callers discuss the pros and cons of raising the minimum driving age to 17 or 18. People repeated over and over that 16-year-olds just aren't mature enough to be trusted on our roads. I wish I had heard more comments suggesting that we take a closer look at what we can do to better train our new teen drivers.
In the classroom, it was clear to me that the answer to the question of how to keep teens safe is not to raise the driving age but to take the time to inspire and to train them to be great drivers.
Kate Willette is the senior instructional designer at SWERVE Driver Training, a Puget Sound driving school whose mission is to change the way people drive.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
NEW - 5:04 PM
A Florida U.S. Senate candidate and crimes against writing
NEW - 5:05 PM
Guest columnist: Washington Legislature is closing budget gap with student debt
Guest columnist: Seattle Public Schools must do more than replace the chief
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'
Neal Peirce / Syndicated columnist: How do states afford needed investment and budget cuts?
nwautos
Turismo upgrade "Gran Turismo 5: XL Edition" for PlayStation 3 has features such as new car-tuning settings, new NASCAR vehicles, better replay video...
Post a comment
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Social worker recounts minutes before Powell fire
- Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
- Quick decisions: How Washington hired its new football staff
- Council members get briefing on arena proposal, minus details
- Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looms
- Justin Wilcox's versatile defensive style is the right fit for Huskies | Jerry Brewer
- It's Terrence Time: Enigmatic Ross leads Huskies
- Washington men walloped by Oregon, 82-57
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature
506 - Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
404 - AP Source: Obama to change birth control rule
364 - Council members get briefing on arena proposal, minus details
362 - Oregon live game thread
155 - Worker: Josh Powell told son he had 'surprise'
114 - Rough road again
108 - A few late-night notes
96 - USA Today further spells out how Mariners, handful of clubs next in line for huge cash windfall
76 - Marijuana legalization initiative set to go on Nov. ballot
74
- Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Economy, blogs give survivalists new reason to look to Northwest
- State's share of mortgage settlement: $648 million
- Bellevue College adds a third bachelor's degree program
- Darren Berg gets 18-year sentence for Ponzi scheme
- One man's audacious pursuit of sailing history
- $25B settlement reached over foreclosure abuses
- 'Gauguin and Polynesia': dazzling mix-and-match | Art review







