Originally published Thursday, July 3, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Guest columnist
"Death With Dignity" initiative deserves dignified consideration
I first began to think about a "death with dignity" law for Washington when I was preparing some remarks for an event honoring me for my...
Special to The Times
I first began to think about a "death with dignity" law for Washington when I was preparing some remarks for an event honoring me for my lifetime contributions to the state. These events are good for the ego; but, they are also a reminder that the road ahead is far shorter than the road behind.
As I looked ahead, I thought of the many Parkinson's disease patients I have come to know since being diagnosed with this affliction in the mid-1990s and the terrible suffering that many endured in the last days of their lives. I know a similar fate awaits me.
All my life, I have made the important choices for myself. Some were easy and turned out well. Others were very difficult. As I looked ahead to my final days, I wanted the right to make a final choice — to have some control over the time and manner of my death.
When I first announced my plans to field a "death with dignity" campaign, I was deluged with stories about loved ones suffering terribly in the last days of their lives. These stories increased my commitment and gave me needed energy.
My first inclination was to craft a "best in the nation" law governing how and when a physician could assist a terminally ill patient in dying. I wanted the law to be available to people like me who suffer progressively debilitating terminal diseases like Parkinson's. But the more I looked, the more convinced I became that Oregon already had the best possible law on its books even though a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease could not qualify a patient to receive aid in dying.
Most important, the Oregon Death with Dignity Act has passed the test of time. Every independent analysis over the 10-year period that the law has been in effect comes to the same conclusion: the safeguards work and abuses have not occurred.
None of the frightening outcomes predicted by opponents came true. It is used infrequently: only one in six requests is granted, 36 percent of the patients who are given the prescriptions do not use them, and its use has been entirely voluntary. It is an important fact that 80 to 90 percent of patients who use the Oregon law are in hospice, and hospice workers there support the system. In other words, the Oregon system provides an additional choice but does not replace existing hospice and palliative care. Such a law does not increase and may decrease hastening death, and gives patients the comfort of knowing they have an option whether or not they choose to use it.
The basic provisions of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act that have been included in Washington's Initiative 1000 include:
• The patient must be diagnosed by two physicians as being terminally ill with less than six months to live
• The patient must repeat the request in writing twice with at least two weeks between requests
• If either physician suspects the person is not mentally competent to make the decision, a mental-health evaluation is required.
• The patient must be provided with information about and access to palliative (hospice) care.
• A prescription may not be written if there is any indication of coercion. Coercion is punishable as a felony.
• The patient must self-administer the medication.
Support for a Death With Dignity Act in Washington is high. The I-1000 campaign has thousands of volunteers across the state. Despite rotten spring weather, they have gathered many thousands more signatures than required to put the initiative on the ballot. Our initial polling shows that two out of three voters favor the proposed law.
Despite the fact that every independent analysis of Oregon's law concludes that its safeguards work, I-1000 will be opposed by the same groups that fought passage of the Oregon measure and then tried to repeal it. They will use the same claims — now disproved by experience — that HMOs and greedy families might coerce people into choosing to end their lives or that dying patients who are depressed would make inappropriate decisions.
Based on their religious beliefs, many people think that a person should not under any circumstances choose to end their life. I respect this moral belief, but it should not be the basis for state law — and the people who hold those beliefs would not choose to use the provisions of the Death With Dignity Act. It is a matter of choice, after all.
Booth Gardner served as governor of Washington state from 1985-93.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
NEW - 03:42 PM
Kate Riley / Times staff columnist: Obama's practical immigration-reform approach: Legalize status of illegal workers
NEW - 03:42 PM
Ellen Goodman / Syndicated columnist: Independence and the elderly: the road test
NEW - 03:42 PM
George Will / Syndicated columnist: On matters of discrimination, the nation slogs on, and on ...
NEW - 03:42 PM
The gift of wilderness for the people of Washington
Guest columnist: How to keep Boeing in Puget Sound when South Carolina beckons
Tribal Fireworks Rivalry
The Fourth of July marks a long-standing fireworks rivalry between two clans of a Native-American family in Suquamish.
Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
Tax tips for new independent professionals
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
nwhomes

Find a new home or condo that fits your lifestyle.
Search New Developments
Builder Directory
- Bicyclist killed Wednesday night is identified
- Politics Northwest | Stephen Colbert takes on lawsuit against Seattle fireworks show
- Speculation grows for Boeing 787 plant in South Carolina
- Yakima teacher reprimanded for sending 5-year-old student home with bag of feces in backpack
- Feds arrest 31 in drug raids from Lynnwood to Northern California
- 6 jurors swear a cop's wife swayed panel in Kent civil rights case
- Feds seize Madoff penthouse, wife leaves
- Rivals show up at Hutchison news conference
- Girl, 14, clung to life on jet debris off Comoros Island
- Winter snowpack melts into waterfalls
- Obama's own party worried health plan lacks votes
246 - Palin resigning as Alaska governor
238 - Seattle Mariners at New York Yankees: 07/02 game thread
200 - Seattle Mariners at Boston Red Sox: 07/04 game thread
179 - Eyman turns in signatures for new initiative to limit government spending
168 - Seattle Mariners see bats come alive for 8-4 win over New York Yankees
122 - Recession wipes out 9 years of job gains
82 - Yakima teacher reprimanded for backpack feces
75 - 6 jurors swear a cop's wife swayed panel in Kent civil rights case
58 - Obama's practical immigration-reform approach: Legalize status of illegal workers
57
- Paddler's paradise: South Sound offers quiet and beauty
- Politics Northwest | Stephen Colbert takes on lawsuit against Seattle fireworks show
- Winter snowpack melts into waterfalls
- Speculation grows for Boeing 787 plant in South Carolina
- Jerry Large | An aging parent forces agonizing decision
- Going to Gas Works Park? Good luck
- Liven up Fremont's attempt to break a world record for a 'zombie walk'
- Lynnwood's City Bank gets tighter scrutiny
- Costco contacts customers as beef recalled
- Bicyclist killed Wednesday night is identified








