Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Thursday, December 23, 2004 at 12:00 AM

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Guest columnist

Standards in place for a fair recount

Despite the rumors surrounding the 2004 governor's race, at least one certainty is quite clear: Our democracy is not falling apart at the seams. Solid procedures are in place to...

Special to The Times

Despite the rumors surrounding the 2004 governor's race, at least one certainty is quite clear: Our democracy is not falling apart at the seams.

Solid procedures are in place to handle the recount and its contested ballots fairly and accurately.

At the heart of the public debate is whether to count 700-plus contested ballots in King County. Some argue all should count, while others maintain — just as passionately — this group of ballots should be rejected.

As is often the case with election law, the answer is not that simple. No all-or-nothing solution exists.

Each contested ballot must be judged on its own merits so that every voter is given full consideration in the democratic process.

What are the standards?

In a recount, your ballot is held to the same standards used in the original count.

Your ballot counts if:

• You are a registered voter of the state of Washington;

• Your signature matches the signature on your voter registration card;

• Your ballot arrived on time;

• And you clearly voted for one candidate in the governor's race.

If it's unclear these standards have been met, the ballots are sent to an independent county canvassing board. Canvassing boards are made up of the county's chief election official, the prosecuting attorney and a member of the county legislative body. Canvassing boards have a long history in Washington of rising above partisan politics.

In a recount, a canvassing board should not reconsider counting contested ballots it has already properly reviewed and rejected. Nor should it count ballots that have been sitting in an unsecured location.

However, canvassing boards should consider counting ballots that were mistakenly tossed out by election workers and give each its full review under the law.

Washington's voting process is not perfect. It demands constant improvement. In January, I will announce a series of election reforms resulting from lessons learned in the 2004 governor's race.

Even so, and especially in the midst of controversy and court challenges, voters should take great pride in our strong history of fair and accurate elections.

This historic recount should run its course and the people should select our next governor.

Public trust and confidence in our democracy is as important as the outcome of this race.

Sam Reed is Washington's secretary of state.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

More Opinion

NEW - 11:58 AM
David S. Broder / Syndicated columnist: Lessons learned in '94 could be valuable to Congress

Guest columnist: Act soon to keep residents, workers and employees safe in downtown Seattle

David Brooks / Syndicated columnist: Building trust from ground up

Guest columnist: Community policing is a better idea than succumbing to fear

Guest columnist: Rural school districts are effective and don't need consolidation

More Opinion headlines...


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

nwautos

NADAguides.com's best car buys for 2010; a Ford Mustang packed with Kentucky pridenew
(Volkswagen) Auto guide group reveals 2010 car picks NADAguides.com has announced its "Best Car Buys" for 2010 based on fuel efficiency, warranty cove...
Post a comment

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising