Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words opinion@seattletimes.com.

December 28, 2010 at 4:00 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Metro ad backers decry decision

Posted by Letters editor

Promoting violence, vandalism not free speech

Sandi Doughton’s article raises serious questions [“Speakers decry Metro decision to ban ad on buses,” NW Saturday, Dec. 25]. Promoting hate speech that could incite violence, vandalism and disruption of bus service is not “free speech.”

Anti-Israel messages have been known to inflame and lead to hate crimes against Jews and others, such as the Naveed Haq shooting at the Jewish Federation in July 2006.

Dow Constantine and Metro management are to be commended for doing the right thing for canceling the inflammatory and one-sided ads that should not have been initially approved under current Metro policies.

Israel has always embraced the sacredness of human life, while the Palestinians have not. Until there is a positive change of the culture of hatred, violence and death by Palestinians, Israel must remain militarily strong. Israel’s self-defensive measures against hundreds of rocket attacks launched indiscriminately from the Gaza Strip against its citizens is not a “war crime.”

— Josh Basson, Seattle

Constantine violated free-speech rights, plain and simple

Dow Constantine has broken the law by violating the First Amendment rights of free speech by reneging on the contract to have Metro buses display placards that tell the truth about Israel’s war crimes.

Under the Washington state constitution, any citizen of King County who is at least 18 years of age has standing to commence a recall action against him. I urge any so situated individual to do so.

If the guidelines for noncommercial ads change, that is one thing, but to change them after Metro has entered into a contract is both a breach of contract and a violation of First Amendment rights and subject to all applicable civil and criminal remedies.

— Mark Bennett, Bonney Lake

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010