Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words opinion@seattletimes.com.

Blog Home | E-mail Opinion staff | RSS feeds Subscribe

February 8, 2010 at 3:59 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Krauthammer: degrading the peasants

Posted by Letters editor

‘Joe and Jane citizen’ aren’t practicing common sense

Charles Krauthammer’s “The peasants are revolting” makes some sense [Opinion, Feb. 5]. However, Americans since 1945 appear to apply decreasing common sense, instead choosing what is decidedly less healthy for individuals and the U.S. as a supposedly “model democracy.” Today’s escalating trend: degrade government and politicians and “ennoble” Joe and Jane citizen.

Joe and Jane citizen are frequently hyper-consumers, unwilling to pay taxes to fund the too few, ill-equipped troops. Our “peasants” have shorter life expectancy, higher infant mortality, lower job skills and more incivility than other industrialized democracies.

We have congealed into a fractious, self-indulgent nation whose view of “freedom” seems to mean more consumption, no savings and an “it’s their fault” response to problems. While we claim to detest our elected representatives, we re-elect nearly all of them.

Krauthammer degrades liberals for degrading “peasants.” Well, just look at peasants who behave self-destructively and ignorantly state: “Government should get out of my Social Security.” Consider today’s growing tea party; What do they represent that really benefits America? [They] overstate that “Taxes are wrong, government is inept and health-care reform is socialistic.”

Each of these epithets contains some validity. But the issue is how do we rapidly convert epithets into accurate problem statements that — when agreed to — lead to utilitarian solutions? Krauthammer’s ongoing exposure of liberal versus conservative agendas fails to map out clear, concise and compelling answers to these problems.

— Peter Loeb, Sequim

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

No comments have been posted to this article. Start the conversation.

Recent entries

Mar 9, 10 - 4:00 PM
Death with Dignity: one year later

Mar 9, 10 - 3:59 PM
Health-care roundup: Krauthammer stirs the pot

Mar 9, 10 - 3:58 PM
Drought could mean higher energy prices

Mar 8, 10 - 4:00 PM
Cutting higher education

Mar 8, 10 - 3:59 PM
Distracted driving

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009