Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words opinion@seattletimes.com.

Blog Home | E-mail Opinion staff | RSS feeds Subscribe

November 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Comments (10)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Initiative 1033: confidently rejected

Posted by Letters editor

I-1033 lost because of Eyman, not opposition

The people of Washington didn’t vote against Tim Eyman’s latest Initiative 1033 because the opposing campaign spent more [“Eyman’s tax initiative loses,” News, Nov. 4].

In my opinion, they voted it down because they understood it was a bad law, and they are sick of Eyman. Personally, I am very tired of his incessant initiatives, and the bombastic and narcissistic approach he takes to getting them passed.

If you want to help govern this state, run for a seat in the bloody Legislature.

Eyman’s main whine with I-1033 was about the Legislature raising taxes. So? It is a fact that the Legislature may need to increase taxes. If demands for services the state of Washington provides don’t decrease, and current tax revenues do not rebound, raising taxes will be a necessity.

We don’t need Eyman to save us from this; we need him to quit wasting election dollars on self-serving, narrow-minded, unnecessary attempts at lawmaking.

— Matt Andrews, Seattle

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

I think I-1033 lost because of the campaigns against it, as well as because of the distrust of Eyman. This bill I thought was better than a lot...  Posted on November 5, 2009 at 8:42 AM by sephers165. Jump to comment
If the Legislature was doing it's job by running the state efficiently and keeping spending in check, then Eyman would not have an audience or...  Posted on November 5, 2009 at 9:57 AM by slyther. Jump to comment
But you see, it's not the demand for 'services' but each legislator's pet project. We don't need all the crap programs...  Posted on November 5, 2009 at 7:03 AM by QuantumForce. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Nov 23, 09 - 4:01 PM
A book tour for the rogue elephant, Sarah Palin

Nov 23, 09 - 4:00 PM
Bucking health-care reform myths

Nov 23, 09 - 3:59 PM
Mammogram mania: Risking lives or dollars?

Nov 23, 09 - 3:58 PM
Molested girl awarded $1.5 million

Nov 21, 09 - 4:00 PM
Tim Eyman's failure, a success for state finances?

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Browse the archives

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009