Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words opinion@seattletimes.com.

October 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Thomas L. Friedman on American politics

Posted by Letters editor

Feelings of despair

One of my first things to read in The Times is the editorial page, followed by enough venting to get me going. On Thursday it was Thomas L. Friedman’s column [“There’s no ‘we’ in American politics,” Opinion, Syndicated columnist, Oct. 1].

Rather than venting, a feeling of extreme sadness settled over me. Why? Because I realized every word was true, and had the capability of destroying our country or at least some of our leaders.

When we have people attending public meetings with an AK-47 over their shoulder, we are already in trouble regardless of what the Second Amendment means.

As I continued to think about the column, I also realized I had no idea how to fix the problem, except to call out my friends when I hear them spewing some of the vitriolic right-wing statements — most of which is engendered by the likes of Rush Limbaugh — against our leaders.

Any one care to join me?

— Hugh R. Givens, Kirkland

The rest of us are the “we”

Friedman’s column enumerated many threats to sensible discourse, including blogging President Obama’s assassination.

The solution is straightforward: Those propagating lies or inciting riot should go to jail. Retorts abound about freedom of speech, protecting the press, and can we tell what is a lie?

Speech has restrictions. It is criminal to threaten the president, incite riot, or cry “Fire!” falsely in a theater.

If a reporter reports someone said something and that person did, there is no lie. If that person did not or does not exist, the reporter is lying. Courts decide the truth regularly.

A French politician is about to begin serving a sentence for lying about his opponent in the last election.

As Friedman said, we can agree, disagree or argue about programs or policies, but it may be criminal to lie about individuals, their policies, proposals, or the relevant facts.

Such crimes are more dangerous and destructive than car theft. These criminals are a small, if sometimes influential, minority.

The rest of us are the we in politics.

— Leonard D. Goodisman, Bothell

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009