Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words opinion@seattletimes.com.

Blog Home | E-mail Opinion staff | RSS feeds Subscribe

July 27, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Comments (3)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Robots in control: Idea may not be so far-fetched

Posted by Letters editor

Slow technological advances to avoid digital disaster

Thanks for printing John Markoff's story ["Uh-oh; robots might one day outsmart us," page one, July 26] on the ongoing evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. It should be noted that the advances that have been made in the fields of computerization, cybernetics and AI have already caused "profound social disruptions" that threaten "dangerous consequences."

Electronic gadgetry is diffused throughout our world. The consequences of this have been ambiguous at best and in some cases disastrous.

The omnipresence of television, cellphones and related media provide ubiquitous entertainment and distraction and allow for quick social connection while contributing to short attention spans, illiteracy and innumeracy.

One of the individuals mentioned in the story is Bill Joy, co-founder of Sun Microsystems. A few years ago, Joy actually called for a moratorium on all further research in AI and other related fields.

Joy referred to this moratorium as "relinquishment." More than most, Joy is deeply aware of the transformative power of refined and recondite technologies that may soon be made manifest. He made it clear he was not confident that these would be employed in the wisest fashion, but his suggestion was mostly ignored.

The ongoing efforts in AI are likely to continue unabated with little reflection regarding the potentially deleterious side effects.

But at some point, we may be wise to revisit Joy's suggestion before we find ourselves not necessarily displaced by self-directed artificially-intelligent machines but inundated in an incoherent sea of cyber-babble and confronted with a dazzling technotopia wherein genuine existential meaning and human spirituality is diluted in a relentless cyber-circus.

-- Joe Martin, Seattle

Yes, there are robots among us

As to your July 25 article, "Uh-Oh; Robots might someday outsmart us," I've got news for you. They already have. They're called "Republicans."

-- Rob Moitoza, Seattle

Boosted by human avarice, machines will rule the world

Of course machines will one day outsmart us. That is pretty much a certainty. The only thing that will prevent that occurrence is man's self destruction before he improves machines to the point where they can figure out how to reproduce. This is not something people are willing to face, so they tell themselves it will never happen.

The overwhelming majority of people who are educated sufficiently to think about the distant future are possessed of the conceit that man is the final product, either of a grand creator or of evolution.

But that isn't so. Man is just one step in the process of evolution. He will be replaced, most likely by machines.

Machines are the odds-on favorite because avarice is man's heritage, and avarice will bring about the development of increasingly better and smarter machines. Men of wealth and power, large corporations, cartels and governments will always want more.

Machines will work more efficiently than people, so people are phased out of production processes as machines are improved. Armies of human soldiers will be phased out also. Destruction and domination of other countries will be accomplished from a distance until war is seen as unnecessarily wasteful.

Eventually the world will be ruled by a small group of enormous cartels, and these cartels will rely on machines to plan and to execute plans.

Perhaps cows think men are their servants. Most assuredly, remaining humans will think machines are their servants.

-- Tom Difloe, Camano Island

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Rob Moitoza's letter deserves an award for being the least inspired ever published in the Times. It doesn't even make a good bumper...  Posted on July 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM by Bill Riordan. Jump to comment
Rob Moitoza, I have noticed that a lot of the Republican congressmen are going "whir, click, click".  Posted on July 28, 2009 at 8:13 AM by badcat. Jump to comment
"As to your July 25 article, "Uh-Oh; Robots might someday outsmart us," I've got news for you. They already have. They're...  Posted on July 28, 2009 at 4:23 PM by sephers165. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Nov 21, 09 - 4:00 PM
Tim Eyman's failure, a success for state finances?

Nov 21, 09 - 3:59 PM
Mammograms and new breast-cancer guidelines

Nov 21, 09 - 3:58 PM
Don't forget about Sarah Palin 'going rogue'

Nov 20, 09 - 4:02 PM
South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement

Nov 20, 09 - 4:00 PM
Response to Friedman on climate change

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Browse the archives

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009