Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words opinion@seattletimes.com.

Blog Home | E-mail Opinion staff | RSS feeds Subscribe

July 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Comments (13)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Marijuana: Should government be making money on it?

Posted by Letters editor

Legalize marijuana, tax it and move on

With so many truly important issues facing our country today --two wars, a global economic crisis, nuclear weapons in Korea, bank closings, corporate scandals, health-care costs, budget deficits, etc. -- it astounds me that our government and the media continue to rehash minor issues.

This time it is marijuana legalization. Hopefully the rhetoric is a prelude to correcting a mistake made many years ago. Nothing new has been added to this discussion in decades, other than "now we need the tax money."

Opponents to legalization say more study is needed to determine the health risks. I say look around you. The second-largest drug study ever was conducted in the '60s, '70s, '80s, '90s and '00s, second only to that done on cigarettes.

We all know the answer. Just look at the Netherlands, Switzerland, Oakland and Northern California for examples. The only troubling connection I have found is between marijuana policy and politicians looking for a campaign issue.

I challenge all our government officials to become leaders. Stand up -- there can't be any of you left that haven't inhaled, and you are all successful. Be brave -- even President Obama admits the truth.

Regain your credibility, and correct the mistake. Legalize marijuana, tax it and let's move on.

-- Tom Baker, Woodinville

Money is no reason to legalize marijuana

It appears that some who decried the supposed lack of "science-based" policy from the Bush administration seem to have forgotten their own verbiage.

California's marijuana industry is thriving ["California finds pot is a huge cash cow," page one, July 19], and it now appears pot can cure allergies, insomnia, throat inflammation and sugar cravings.

It's a miracle drug! Does it cure impotence too? Oops. Not from what those pesky scientists have said.

Where's the science to support any of this? If marijuana cures allergies, that would be front-page news. Insomnia? Get real. The truth is that people use the science argument only when the views of one party disagree with their own. In the words of one man who gets his weed with a doctor's note, this whole policy is a joke that just legalizes what people already wanted. Medicine has nothing to do with it.

And never mind the environmental degradation, the used-up farmland and wasted water, the thriving and murderous criminal cartels that won't pay taxes anyway and the populations sedated into apathy and complacence.

The reason for all this? It's also green, but you can't smoke it, though you can burn through it pretty fast.

Governments are pressured to sign on to this for one reason: money. And when money is the primary motivation for making wholesale changes to criminal and social policies, I think that ought to be a major cause for concern.

-- Dan Magill, Seattle

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

There is no real debate anymore that one can make against Marijuana being made legal. Let's make it happen people!  Posted on July 26, 2009 at 11:51 PM by WesDay. Jump to comment
It appears money may finally do what common sense and decency should have done a long time ago; legalize marihuana. Farm it here, distribute it...  Posted on July 27, 2009 at 6:43 AM by East of Eden. Jump to comment
Yes. Govt's should make money on it. In California's case it should be treated like the wine industry. Or like any other sin tax. But, it...  Posted on July 26, 2009 at 5:12 PM by Nextnik. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Nov 21, 09 - 4:00 PM
Tim Eyman's failure, a success for state finances?

Nov 21, 09 - 3:59 PM
Mammograms and new breast-cancer guidelines

Nov 21, 09 - 3:58 PM
Don't forget about Sarah Palin 'going rogue'

Nov 20, 09 - 4:02 PM
South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement

Nov 20, 09 - 4:00 PM
Response to Friedman on climate change

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Browse the archives

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009