Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Northwest Voices | Letters to the Editor

Welcome to The Seattle Times' online letters to the editor, a sampling of readers' opinions. Join the conversation by commenting on these letters or send your own letter of up to 200 words opinion@seattletimes.com.

June 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Tobacco regulation

Posted by Letters editor


It's not the only product
taxpayers shouldn't subsidize

Editor, The Times:

In ["Big tobacco finally loses," editorial, June 12], you argued that "there is no good reason for taxpayers to continue to subsidize [tobacco production]." I agree. Taxpayers should not be forced to pay for the production of a product that has led to people living unhealthy lifestyles. However, tobacco is hardly the only problem.

For example, the government has spent nearly $40 billion during the past decade subsidizing corn production. As a result, it is much cheaper to make food with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). While no type of sugar is healthy, there is a strong correlation between the rise in use of HFCS and the rise of obesity in the United States.

Also, many studies suggest that HFCS is unhealthier than pure sugar and can alter natural metabolic processes. The government should consider these types of unintended health consequences before handing out subsidies.

-- Jeffrey McCoy, Seattle

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

Recent entries

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009