Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published September 8, 2010 at 6:18 PM | Page modified September 8, 2010 at 6:42 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

How the next Congress could change after election

What (if anything) will get done in Washington next year? That depends largely on which party is in charge of Congress. Democrats could lose one or both sides of the Capitol — or retain control of both. A look at the possibilities:

The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — What (if anything) will get done in Washington next year? That depends largely on which party is in charge of Congress. Democrats could lose one or both sides of the Capitol — or retain control of both. A look at the possibilities:

Republicans win House,

Democrats keep Senate

The outcome most likely to result in gridlock. Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, as House speaker, would preside over an expanded bloc of conservative Republicans and an agenda that could include further tax cuts, an attempt to repeal or modify the health-care law, a rollback of Wall Street regulations, and the return of unspent stimulus funds — all of which Democrats, and the president, would fight. The GOP would regain control of committees, and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., likely to become chairman of the powerful House oversight committee, would launch wide-ranging hearings into White House policies and use his subpoena power to call administration officials to testify (just as Democrats did with Bush officials). House GOP leaders could seek ambitious entitlement and tax overhauls but would be rebuffed by the Democratic Senate, where Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., or his successor would emerge as President Obama's most important ally.

Republicans win Senate,

Democrats keep House

This intriguing, if unlikely, scenario would pit the new Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. — two perennially underestimated masters of the inside game. McConnell would face the mighty task of herding a divergent GOP caucus that could include unpredictable newcomers such as libertarian and tea-party favorite Rand Paul. Sixty still would be the magic number of votes needed to head off a filibuster, and McConnell would be forced to scrounge and bargain his way through the depleted, demoralized (and downright hostile) Democratic ranks to patch together support for the energy-industry incentives and trade deals on his to-do list.

In the House, Pelosi would face pressure from moderate Democrats to ditch liberal priorities such as climate change that nearly sunk the party at the ballot box, and to cut deals with the Senate. Pelosi has said she wants to push ahead with an overhaul of immigration laws, but agreement between the parties on that volatile issue probably would be dead until 2013.

Republicans win

House and Senate

If the GOP runs the table in November, months of internal battling could be necessary to sort out which version of the party will emerge as dominant: the old-school Republican establishment or the more ideological and rigid new guard.

Possible priorities for an all-Republican Congress could include the termination of stimulus funding and the repeal of part or all of the new health-care law along with major changes to Social Security, including raising the retirement age.

advertising

A GOP-led Congress would turn Obama's veto pen — or the threat of it — into a powerful weapon. Moderate Democrats such as Sens. Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Mark Warner of Virginia and Jim Webb of Virginia could gain extraordinary leverage as dealmakers courted by leaders of both parties.

Democrats keep control

of House and Senate

The shock of nearly losing power would be certain to temper Democrats' legislative ambition. The most chastened Democrats would be liberals who fought for the health-care and climate-change bills that distracted Congress from the jobs agenda that voters say they would have preferred.

In the Senate, "control" could be especially difficult to exercise. It already was tough for Reid to win over enough Republicans on contentious votes to head off GOP filibuster threats. With fewer Democrats, it would become even harder — although the new GOP class may include a crop of moderates such as Mark Kirk of Illinois and Mike Castle of Delaware, along with independent Charlie Crist of Florida, who could prove amenable to bipartisanship.

In the House, the voting balance might change very little even with a larger number of Republicans. Assuming Democratic losses mainly were in conservative districts, Pelosi would lose members who already were tough to keep in line on difficult votes.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Nation & World

UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port

UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya

UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes

Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates

Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

More Nation & World headlines...

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising