Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published June 29, 2010 at 8:10 PM | Page modified June 30, 2010 at 8:21 AM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Senate set to OK Petraeus

The Senate Armed Services Committee later voted to approve Petraeus and referred his nomination to the full Senate, which was to vote on his confirmation Wednesday. The general is expected in Kabul by Friday.

The New York Times

Related developments

U.N. car attacked: A United Nations vehicle was riddled with bullets at a busy traffic circle in Kabul on Tuesday, killing an Afghan employee.

Dog rumor: Seven Afghan police were injured in a melee after rumors spread in Kabul on Tuesday that U.S. troops had desecrated a madrassa, or religious seminary, by bringing dogs along on a raid. In Islam, dogs are considered unclean.

McChrystal retirement: Gen. Stanley McChrystal, dismissed last week after Rolling Stone magazine published disparaging comments that he and members of his staff had made about administration officials, will retain his four-star rank when he retires from the military, the White House said Tuesday. The decision means he will earn about $149,700 per year before taxes in military retirement pay.

Corruption charge: Afghanistan's attorney general, Mohammad Ishaq Alako, disputed published allegations that he had been pressured by the Afghan political leadership to sideline corruption investigations into some of the country's elite, and accused U.S. Ambassador Karl W. Eikenberry of pressing him to bring particular cases against high-profile figures.

Foreign aid: On Monday, Rep. Nita M. Lowey, D-N.Y., the chairwoman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on foreign aid, announced she was cutting most of the $3.9 billion in foreign aid requested for Afghanistan by the Obama administration until the country got a handle on corruption.

New offensive: U.S. and Afghan forces battled hundreds of militants from an al-Qaida-linked group for a third day in Kunar province of eastern Afghanistan, the U.S. military said.

Pakistan missile attack: Suspected U.S. missiles hit a house Tuesday in a Pakistani tribal region along the Afghan border where the army has been battling Taliban fighters, and at least 10 suspected militants were killed, including a possible al-Qaida operative.

Iraq killings: A burst of violence across Iraq on Tuesday claimed the lives of 14 people, most related to what appears to be a campaign of assassinations aimed at officials amid the country's extended political crisis.

Seattle Times news services

WASHINGTON — Gen. David Petraeus said Tuesday he would review restrictions on U.S. airstrikes and artillery in Afghanistan, which have cut down on civilian casualties but have been bitterly criticized by U.S. troops who say they have made the fight more dangerous.

Petraeus' statement, made in his Senate confirmation hearing to be the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, signaled what could be his first departure from the policies of the former top U.S. commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who was fired last week by President Obama.

The Senate Armed Services Committee later voted to approve Petraeus and referred his nomination to the full Senate, which was to vote on his confirmation Wednesday. The general is expected in Kabul by Friday.

In his plans to review McChrystal's rules of engagement — which Petraeus oversaw as the head of U.S. Central Command and the overall manager of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — Petraeus acknowledged the tension between fighting a war and protecting and winning over the civilian population in a classic counterinsurgency campaign.

McChrystal, who embraced the counterinsurgency doctrine, had faced rising complaints in recent months from troops who said they felt "handcuffed" by the rules and that restrictions on airstrikes had prolonged battles and cost lives.

"If confirmed, I would continue the emphasis on reducing loss of civilian life in the course of operations to an absolute minimum, while also ensuring that we provide whatever assets are necessary to ensure the safety" of U.S., NATO and Afghan forces, Petraeus said in a written answer to a question asked in advance by the committee.

Despite the general's focus on rules of engagement, the dominant issue among the senators was the merits of a July 2011 White House-imposed deadline for the start of withdrawals of troops from Afghanistan.

As he has in the past, Petraeus carefully straddled in his answers, saying that he fully supported the deadline as a "message of urgency to compliment this message of enormous commitment" of nearly 100,000 U.S. forces in Afghanistan, but that it was only "the beginning of a process" and that the U.S. commitment to the country was enduring.

At a national security meeting at the White House last week, Petraeus said, "The vice president grabbed me and said, 'You should know I am 100 percent supportive of this policy.' "

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Nation & World

UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port

UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya

UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes

Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates

Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

More Nation & World headlines...

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

advertising


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising