Originally published March 11, 2010 at 10:18 PM | Page modified March 12, 2010 at 9:02 AM
Comments (26)
E-mail article
Print view
Share
Major employers to shift more health-care costs to workers, survey shows
Most major employers plan to shift more health-care costs to their workers next year, according to a survey released Thursday. Many say they may...
The Washington Post
Most major employers plan to shift more health-care costs to their workers next year, according to a survey released Thursday.
Many say they may charge more to cover spouses, tighten eligibility standards for their health plans and dispense financial rewards or penalties based on the results of certain lab tests. At some companies, overweight employees could be excluded from the best plans.
Meanwhile, employees at many companies can expect significantly higher premiums, deductibles and co-payments, according to the annual survey by the National Business Group on Health, a coalition of major employers, and Towers Watson, a consulting firm that advises companies on employee benefits.
"This shows that the constant, unrelenting increases in health-care costs are going to cost employees and their families more and more," said Helen Darling, president of the business group.
Faced with rapidly rising medical expenses, "employers are going to have to do something," she said.
People who work for large corporations have some of the most stable and comprehensive medical coverage in the nation.
They are insulated from insurance-industry practices at the heart of the nation's health-care debate, such as having their policies rescinded after getting sick or being denied coverage based on pre-existing conditions.
But the new survey is a reminder that even people who are satisfied with their insurance plans cannot count on a continuation of the status quo.
With or without an insurance overhaul, coverage at big corporations is likely to become less affordable, and it could become more restrictive.
The survey, which involved 507 employers with at least 1,000 employees each, was conducted in November, December and January.
It found anxiety among employers about the government's plans to revamp the health-care system.
Although the substance of the pending legislation has been a moving target, more than two-thirds of those surveyed said they expected it to make their plans more costly; 2 percent said the opposite. Twenty-seven percent of firms predicted it would prompt them to make coverage less generous, while 14 percent said it would make them more generous.
![]()
Darling's view of the legislation, though, is that it would affect large employers "very little" and that it should do more to help control the cost of corporate health benefits.
Meanwhile, employers continue to take matters into their hands. Fifty-six percent plan to hold employees responsible for a larger share of the costs next year, the survey found.
Towers Watson consultant Ted Nussbaum said he doubts employers will follow through on that prediction.
One of the survey's more surprising findings is that, during economic hard times, the share of premiums borne by employees at big companies has not risen more. On average, employees are paying 21 percent of total premiums this year, up from 20 percent last year, Nussbaum noted.
He predicted that employers will use other approaches.
So-called spousal surcharges impose a fee if an employee's spouse enrolls in the company plan, despite having the option of receiving coverage through his or her job.
The theory is that spouses who take advantage of the company plan are likely to be heavier consumers of health care. Twenty-eight percent of employers plan to use spousal surcharges next year, up from 21 percent this year, the survey found.
Although only 3 or 4 percent of employers give employees financial incentives to meet targets for blood pressure, weight and cholesterol, 13 to 14 percent are considering doing so, the survey found. Six to 7 percent are considering declaring that only employees who meet targets can enroll in "preferred" health-care plans, up from 1 percent now.
Nineteen percent of large employers are considering giving workers incentives to undergo biometric screening and health-risk appraisals, on top of 22 percent that already do.
In addition, employers increasingly are moving toward high-deductible plans, which carry lower premiums while leaving workers responsible for higher out-of-pocket expenses. Next year, 12 percent of employers plan to offer only high-deductible coverage, the survey found.
Employers and insurers have placed great hope in high-deductible plans, but the survey found that, while companies can save money by switching to such plans, it now appears that over time their costs rise as fast as those for other types of coverage.
E-mail article
Print view
Share
Bleak outlook for economy as growth slows
White House urges halt to spilling of war secrets
UPDATE - 08:11 PM
Ariz. governor considers changing immigration law
Calif. city with highly paid officials has steeper taxes than Beverly Hills, Malibu

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech
shopping
events for Friday, Jul. 30
- Totokaelo Sale
- 70 percent off at Karan Dannenberg Clothier
- Up to 70 percent off at Karen's Vintage Coutu...
- Something Silver's Anniversary Sale
editors' picks
- Pioneer Square shopping
- West Seattle shopping
- Vintage, consignment and used clothing
- Phinney Ridge & Greenwood shopping
- Seafair and I-5, I-90 closures will snarl weekend traffic
- Steve Sarkisian isn't bothered after Huskies picked 6th in Pac-10
- Court won't keep woman who starved a daughter from new baby
- Fremont's Buckaroo Tavern, a Seattle landmark, to close
- Mont. officials await test results in bear attack
- Seattle man convicted of molesting girls, 11 and 15
- Sailor slain in Afghanistan recalled as 'always upbeat'
- Ariz. governor considers changing immigration law
- Want to fix the Mariners? Time to take a page from Bill James and start thinking "outside the box" again | Mariners Blog
- Tenacious ex-Husky Jon Brockman creates niche, fame for himself | Jerry Brewer
- Arizona sheriff not relenting after court ruling
727 - Want to fix the Mariners? Time to take a page from Bill James and start thinking "outside the box" again
273 - Tunnel foes will try to get public vote on the project
190 - Mariners at Minnesota Twins: July 30, 2010 game thread
165 - Grocery workers' sick deal
123 - White Sox 9, Mariners 5: M's swept away by Chicago power onslaught
107 - Court won't keep woman who starved a daughter from new baby
93 - Mariners freefalling towards worst month in franchise history
83 - Fremont's Buckaroo Tavern, a Seattle landmark, to close
68 - White House urges halt to spilling of war secrets
65
- Fremont's Buckaroo Tavern, a Seattle landmark, to close
- Dance class helps Parkinson's patients use movement as a strategy
- Bear attack in Montana leaves 1 dead, 2 injured
- Chelan's Lakeshore Trail offers scenery, sun — and cold beer at trail's end
- Everett's Jetty Island is an oasis of sand, sunshine and sweet memories
- Mount Rainier climber killed after fall into crevasse
- Mont. officials await test results in bear attack
- Target buys space for retail store downtown
- Seafair and I-5, I-90 closures will snarl weekend traffic
- Flying by the seat of his seat | Picture This


