Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Saturday, September 19, 2009 at 12:08 AM

Comments (5)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Pakistan 'reluctant' to target extremists

Eight years after the United States and Pakistan agreed to fight the Taliban and al-Qaida, Pakistani officials have "different priorities" from the U.S., Anne Patterson said in a recent interview.

McClatchy Newspapers

Related developments

Pakistan bombing: Scores of victims filled hospital beds after a suicide car bomber destroyed a two-story hotel Friday near Kohat in northwest Pakistan, killing 29 people and wounding 55. It was the second attack in two days in the area, which is close to Pakistan's rugged border region with Afghanistan where al-Qaida and Taliban militants hold sway. The attack took place in the Shiite-dominated village of Usterzai. As of late Friday, no one had claimed responsibility for the attack.

Troop deaths: A U.S. service member and a Canadian soldier died in separate roadside bombings in southern Afghanistan, officials said Friday.

Seattle Times news services

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Despite growing U.S. military losses in Afghanistan, Pakistan still refuses to target the extremist groups on its soil that are the biggest threat to the U.S.-led mission there, the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan said.

Eight years after the United States and Pakistan agreed to fight the Taliban and al-Qaida, Pakistani officials have "different priorities" from the U.S., Anne Patterson said in a recent interview. Pakistan is "certainly reluctant to take action" against the leadership of the Afghan insurgency.

As the war in Afghanistan becomes more brutal and as its political and popular support wanes in the U.S., Pakistan's refusal to act in support of U.S. goals is undermining the U.S. effort to deny al-Qaida and other extremist groups a sanctuary in Afghanistan.

The most effective Taliban fighters, the Haqqani network of veteran Afghan jihadist Jalaluddin Haqqani and his son Sirajuddin, operate out of the North Waziristan region of Pakistan's tribal territory. Taliban founder Mullah Mohammad Omar is widely thought to be based in the western Pakistani city of Quetta, from which he directs the insurgency through the "Quetta Shura," or leadership council.

Experts on the Afghanistan war think military progress and political stability won't be possible there unless the government roots out the havens the insurgents have established in western Pakistan. The International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London-based research center, concluded in its annual review this week that "Pakistan remained the biggest source of instability for Afghanistan."

Pakistani officials, however, say their country's priority should be to tackle Islamic militants who threaten Pakistan. They charge that the U.S. is blind to Pakistan's concerns over traditional foe India as it presses Pakistan to redeploy forces from its eastern border with India to the western border with Afghanistan.

The disagreement between the United States and Pakistan was illustrated this week when former President Pervez Musharraf acknowledged in a television interview that he'd diverted U.S. military equipment that was meant to fight the Taliban in western Pakistan for use against India.

"One doesn't care who one crosses," Musharraf told Pakistan's Express News.

In testimony Tuesday before Congress, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael Mullen, said: "The Pakistani military ... consider their principal threat — their existential threat — to be Indian, not these extremists."

The U.S. has lavished praise on the Pakistani army for the offensive it launched in April against Taliban militants in Pakistan. The operation marked the first serious sign of determination to deal with armed extremists, but it hasn't extended to groups in Pakistan that fight exclusively in Afghanistan. Mullen said that Pakistan's recent anti-terrorism actions "had a big impact" although "it hasn't been perfect."

While Pakistan and the U.S. agree on targeting al-Qaida and, more recently, the Taliban Movement of Pakistan, they strongly disagree over action against Afghan insurgents operating from Pakistani territory.

"Where we differ, of course, is the treatment of the groups who are attacking our troops in Afghanistan," " Patterson said.

More Nation & World headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

The president should go on TV and say the following: If you belong to Al Quida, if you finance Al Quida or if you harbor Al Quida we will hunt you...  Posted on September 19, 2009 at 12:03 PM by Frank519. Jump to comment
One of President Obama's campaign promises was to right the Bush error of allowing these terrorists free use of Pakistan as a sanctuary. He...  Posted on September 19, 2009 at 7:32 AM by hmmmm. Jump to comment
Pakistan's decision is not a threat to us or to any legitimate government in Afghanistan. As long as we are propping up a government of...  Posted on September 19, 2009 at 9:04 AM by Tyrone Shoelaces. Jump to comment

advertising


Get home delivery today!

More Nation & World

UPDATE - 12:08 AM
Round 2: Snow slams Mid-Atlantic, points north

Doctors may alter psychiatric diagnoses

Haiti parents testify they gave kids to Americans

Haiti raises earthquake's death toll to 230,000

Lots of Buzz over Google latest bid at social networking

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

nwautos

Fatal crashes are down in Washington, and a national used-car database goes onlinenew
Associated Press Study: Fatal crashes down in Washington Last year Washington's roads were the scene of the fewest fatal crashes since 1955. According...
Post a comment

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising