Originally published April 2, 2009 at 12:00 AM | Page modified April 2, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Comments (0)
E-mail article
Print
Share
Supreme Court backs power plants over fish
The Supreme Court said Wednesday that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may consider whether protecting fish and other aquatic creatures...
The Washington Post
Other court action
Other Supreme Court rulings Wednesday:Arbitration: The court ruled 5-4 for employers who want to force unionized workers to pursue their age-discrimination claims through arbitration instead of a federal lawsuit. The court said an arbitration agreement negotiated between an employer and a union that strips them of their option to take complaints to court is binding on workers.
Death-row appeals: The court ruled 7-2 that the federal government should pay federally appointed lawyers for working on state clemency requests for death-row inmates.
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Wednesday that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may consider whether protecting fish and other aquatic creatures is worth the cost of the most advanced upgrades for older power plants, a defeat for environmentalists who had challenged the government's position.
The court ruled 6-3 that such cost-benefit decisions are allowed under the Clean Water Act as the agency moved to require more than 500 older power plants to upgrade the ways they draw water to cool machinery. Water-intake systems kill 3.4 billion fish and shellfish each year, the EPA estimated.
But the technology that could bring the older plants more in line with new plants would cost about $3.5 billion annually, the EPA said.
Environmentalists argued that the Clean Water Act requires remedies that "reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact," and that Congress understood it was nearly impossible to put a monetary value on the loss of wildlife. But Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that even the environmentalists acknowledged there was some limit to whether the most advanced technology was worth it.
"It seems to us, therefore, that the phrase 'best technology available,' even with the added specification 'for minimizing adverse environmental impact,' does not unambiguously preclude cost-benefit analysis," he wrote.
Power plants draw more than 214 billion gallons of water from U.S. waterways daily to cool power plants, "squashing," in Scalia's words, billions of fish and other small aquatic creatures against intake screens or sucking them into the cooling systems. In newer plants, closed-cooling systems reduce the rate by 98 percent.
But it is extremely costly to implement such systems at older plants, and the EPA said less expensive plans would reduce the loss by 80 percent to 95 percent.
Industry has long advocated the cost-benefit analysis embraced by the Bush administration's EPA. But whether the Obama administration will feel the same is another question, and environmentalists have begun to lobby for a different approach.
Alex Matthiessen, president of the New York-based environmental group Riverkeeper, which brought the lawsuit, noted that the court did not say the EPA is required to use the cost-benefit analysis, only that it may.
Environmental groups pointed out that new EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson previously headed the environmental protection agency in New Jersey, one of the states that supported Riverkeeper in the suit. An EPA spokeswoman said the department had no comment on the decision.
Justice John Paul Stevens, in dissent, said the majority was ignoring the plain language of the statute, and he found it "puzzling" that the court relied on Congress' silence about whether a cost-benefit analysis was appropriate to decide that it was allowed. He was joined by Justices David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The case is Entergy v. Riverkeeper.
Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company
UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port
UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya
UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes
Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates
Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

nwautos
Are you one of the many hanging onto their old beater? Or do you just love that new-car smell? When did you last purchase a vehicle? Take our poll or....
Post a comment
- Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
- Proposal to link Market, aquarium may be too ambitious for Seattle
- Chilling 911 tapes reveal pleas for help to go to Josh Powell home
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
- UW's Shawn Kemp Jr. makes own way despite familiar name, number | Steve Kelley
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- NBA's David Stern open to league returning to Seattle
- Prosecutor: Powell's final act ends doubt he killed wife
- Was idea of court-ordered test too much for Josh Powell?
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Here it is: The secret to stir-fried chicken | Taste
- Local aerospace suppliers say they feel squeezed by Boeing
- Dicks channeled federal money to Puget Sound project his son ran
- 'Gauguin and Polynesia': dazzling mix-and-match | Art review
- Buttoned Up: Nine immutable laws of time management
- Happy Hour: French-accented charm at Gainsbourg
- One man's audacious pursuit of sailing history
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature







