Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Thursday, January 22, 2009 at 12:00 AM

Print

Study: Steroids don't help wheezing kids

Steroid drugs, a common treatment for young children prone to wheezing and colds, do not help and may even be harmful, according to new...

The Associated Press

LOS ANGELES — Steroid drugs, a common treatment for young children prone to wheezing and colds, do not help and may even be harmful, according to new research.

Preschoolers in Britain who were hospitalized with a wheezing attack and treated with the steroid prednisolone stayed just as long as other children who were given dummy pills.

In another study, Canadian children who had previous wheezing trouble and who took the steroid fluticasone as a preventive measure showed modest improvement, but the side effect of possible stunted growth outweighed the benefit, researchers said.

Both studies were reported in today's New England Journal of Medicine.

"It is disturbing to contemplate how many unnecessary courses of prednisolone have been given over the years, in good faith, because we all assumed that preschool children are little adults," Dr. Andrew Bush of the Royal Brompton Hospital in London wrote in an accompanying editorial.

Wheezing, a high-pitched whistling noise as a person exhales, occurs when air struggles to get through narrowed airways. It's a frightening symptom that often sends parents to emergency rooms, thinking their kids can't breathe.

Hospitals commonly give such children steroids to open up airways. That's a standard treatment for adults and for children who have asthma, but its effectiveness for children with transient wheezing is unknown.

In the British study led by the University of Leicester, 687 children ages 10 months to 5 years who were hospitalized for wheezing were randomly given prednisolone or placebo treatment. There was no significant difference in the time spent in the hospital: 11 hours for the drug group compared with 14 hours for the placebo group.

In the Canadian study, 129 children ages 1 to 6 years with a history of wheezing were given either inhaled fluticasone or placebo by their parents at the first sign of an infection.

After 10 months, the drug group had milder symptoms and needed fewer repeat medications. But they also had smaller gains in height and weight compared with the placebo group, prompting the researchers to urge against using the drug for prevention purposes until the side effects are better understood.

The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline, which makes Flovent nasal spray, a brand of fluticasone. Lead author Dr. Francine Ducharme of the University of Montreal reports receiving research grants from Glaxo and other drugmakers.

The British research was paid for by the nonprofit Asthma UK. Several authors report receiving fees and support from various drugmakers that make asthma medication.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Nation & World headlines...

Print      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

advertising


Get home delivery today!

UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port

UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya

UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes

Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates

Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising