Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published October 3, 2008 at 12:00 AM | Page modified October 3, 2008 at 1:12 AM

Print

Close-up

Pundits whiff in expectations game

The vice-presidential debate scheduled for Thursday night didn't happen — at least not as envisioned by media watchers with their characteristic mix of glee and dread.

Los Angeles Times

The vice-presidential debate scheduled for Thursday night didn't happen — at least not as envisioned by media watchers with their characteristic mix of glee and dread.

Republican candidate Sarah Palin spoke in clear, concise sentences that mostly made sense, and if she didn't answer all the questions posed to her, at least she didn't tell the moderator that she would "have to get back to ya." Neither did Democrat Joseph Biden ramble or froth, mention the fictional televised speeches of FDR or accidentally call the governor of Alaska 'Li'l' Lady.

If you think this is a hyperbolic description of expectations, then you didn't catch David Gergen and his CNN colleagues claiming that what Palin had to prove was her basic competence, including a grasp of the English language.

Meanwhile over at MSNBC, Newsweek's Howard Fineman announced that Biden's job was to get out there, answer the questions and get off the stage "without making news." And, in what was perhaps the most shocking aspect of the entire event, virtually every anchor or pundit agreed that Biden had to tread carefully so as not to seem too aggressive.

If the bar had been placed any lower for this debate, they would have had to bury it.

So how surprising was it really that neither candidate devolved into a Jerry Springer screaming fit or fell into a state of catatonia. In fact, both were in rare form, giving what might have been their best respective campaign performances yet.

Palin came in with a clear advantage, of course; when all you have to do is prove you can address issues in a coherent way it's fairly easy to exceed expectations. She set her tone instantly by asking the senator at the handshake if it was OK to call him Joe. He said, "Yes, of course," and from then on it was "Joe" and "Gov. Palin."

Indeed, with her "bless his/her hearts" and knowing sideline laughs, Palin might have invented an entirely new rhetorical style — random folksiness. Each bit of lighthearted "Sarahness" was followed by a Serious Face as she got down to the issues. Or at least issues that she was comfortable with.

The most pointed difference between the candidates' performances is that Biden answered pretty much each question that was asked before returning to the topic of his choice (most usually how John McCain mirrors the Bush administration.) Palin pronounced early on that she wasn't necessarily going to answer questions, which is to say not at all, but instead would address the American people directly.

If Palin was able to revive flagging Republican spirits by proving that she does have a basic grasp of campaign rhetoric and perhaps even the major issues facing this country, then Biden reminded Democrats why he has been a key player in their party for all these years.

His message was that the middle class drives the economy and that Barack Obama will take care of the middle class. It's a great message given the times, and he stuck with it as tightly as Palin stuck with her "and you said the surge wouldn't work" point about the war.

He was gracious enough not correct his opponent when she got a general's name wrong, although he did say repeatedly that he wasn't hearing how McCain differed from President Bush. He also rebutted any misstatements he felt she had made about his or Obama's record in a decidedly "I was there" sort of way.

advertising

But overall he was the very model of graciousness. Although Palin made several condescending remarks — "I'm happy to know we both love Israel," she said at one point — Biden kept his criticism solely aimed at McCain.

"Say it ain't so, Joe," Palin said at one point, accusing him again of "pointing fingers at the past," just as if she hadn't spent the entire hour and a half talking up McCain's record.

In the end, perhaps the most memorable aspect of the debate was the collective look of confusion on the face of the commentators when the debate they had spent days rattling on about didn't take place.

"I guess we'll just have to wait to hear what the viewers thought," said MSNBC's Chris Matthews, and that really has to be a first.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Nation & World headlines...

Print      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.


Get home delivery today!

UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port

UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya

UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes

Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates

Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising