Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 12:00 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Appellate court agrees to rehear challenge to Seattle Center rules

A popular Seattle street performer known as "Magic Mike," who earlier this year lost a federal appeal on a challenge to regulations at Seattle Center, has won another review of the case before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Seattle Times staff reporter

A popular Seattle street performer who earlier this year lost a federal appeal on a challenge to regulations at Seattle Center has won another review of the case before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

In January, a three-member panel of the appeals court overturned a decision by a Seattle federal judge who had found that rules the center imposed on street performers violated free speech and equal protection. Earlier this month, however, the appeals court agreed to rehear the case "en banc," meaning that a larger panel of at least 11 judges will reconsider the case.

The case was brought by a longtime Seattle busker, Michael Berger, also known as "Magic Mike." He had filed a civil-rights lawsuit in 2003 challenging rules requiring him to buy a $5 permit, perform only in specific locations and only passively seek donations.

In 2005, U.S. District Judge James Robart ruled for Berger before the case went to trial. After the decision, Berger settled for $22,000, but the case continued as the city appealed and both sides continued to work on the civil-rights issues.

When the city prevailed on appeal by a 2-1 vote in January, Berger's attorney, Elena Garella, asked the appeals court for reconsideration on the strength of the dissent by Judge Marsha Berzon.

Garella did not immediately return a phone call for comment.

Berzon wrote that the two-judge majority — 9th Circuit Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain and U.S. District Judge Sam E. Haddon of Montana, sitting by designation of the court — did not see "how radically its holdings alter our law, creating a legal structure which will make it far easier to shut down discourse ... .

"We have always viewed any limitations on speech in traditional public fora [forums] with extreme skepticism," she wrote. "Today's opinion departs from that long tradition."

Telephone messages left with the Seattle City Attorney's Office for comment were not immediately returned.

Mike Carter: 206-464-3706 or mcarter@seattletimes.com

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Nation & World headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

advertising

Obama seeks equal partnership in Asia

NYC trial for 9/11 suspects poses risks

Madoff employees arrested

Fort Hood gunman contacted Pakistan, lawmaker says

Immigration on White House agenda

Advertising

Video

Opening day at Crystal Mountain
Skiers crowded the slopes at Crystal Mountain for one of the resort's earliest openings.

Video shows violent arrest by SPD
Fort Lewis Memorial
Highlights: Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Seattle International Cabaret Festival
Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Medal of Honor
Pelosi answers questions at Swedish Medical Center
Pelosi speaks at Swedish Medical Center
"Pistol" Pete Ryan

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising