Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWapartments | NWsource | Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 - Page updated at 11:45 AM

E-mail article     Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Appellate court agrees to rehear challenge to Seattle Center rules

A popular Seattle street performer known as "Magic Mike," who earlier this year lost a federal appeal on a challenge to regulations at Seattle Center, has won another review of the case before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Seattle Times staff reporter

A popular Seattle street performer who earlier this year lost a federal appeal on a challenge to regulations at Seattle Center has won another review of the case before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

In January, a three-member panel of the appeals court overturned a decision by a Seattle federal judge who had found that rules the center imposed on street performers violated free speech and equal protection. Earlier this month, however, the appeals court agreed to rehear the case "en banc," meaning that a larger panel of at least 11 judges will reconsider the case.

The case was brought by a longtime Seattle busker, Michael Berger, also known as "Magic Mike." He had filed a civil-rights lawsuit in 2003 challenging rules requiring him to buy a $5 permit, perform only in specific locations and only passively seek donations.

In 2005, U.S. District Judge James Robart ruled for Berger before the case went to trial. After the decision, Berger settled for $22,000, but the case continued as the city appealed and both sides continued to work on the civil-rights issues.

When the city prevailed on appeal by a 2-1 vote in January, Berger's attorney, Elena Garella, asked the appeals court for reconsideration on the strength of the dissent by Judge Marsha Berzon.

Garella did not immediately return a phone call for comment.

Berzon wrote that the two-judge majority — 9th Circuit Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain and U.S. District Judge Sam E. Haddon of Montana, sitting by designation of the court — did not see "how radically its holdings alter our law, creating a legal structure which will make it far easier to shut down discourse ... .

"We have always viewed any limitations on speech in traditional public fora [forums] with extreme skepticism," she wrote. "Today's opinion departs from that long tradition."

Telephone messages left with the Seattle City Attorney's Office for comment were not immediately returned.

Mike Carter: 206-464-3706 or mcarter@seattletimes.com

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Nation & World headlines...

E-mail article Print view

advertising

Advertising

Buy a link here

Bombs kill at least 33 Iraqis as provincial elections near

Court: Thai leader must go

Governors to give Obama a wish list

Obama: "New dawn" of leadership

Close-up: Yes, it's a recession, and it's a year old

Advertising

This feature requires Flash 7.

Download Flash

Top video | World | Science / Tech | Entertainment

Marketplace

Advertising