Originally published June 5, 2008 at 12:00 AM | Page modified June 21, 2008 at 5:05 PM
Corrected version
Study secretly tracked cellphone users
Researchers secretly tracked the locations of 100,000 people outside the United States through their cellphone use and concluded that most...
Researchers secretly tracked the locations of 100,000 people outside the United States through their cellphone use and concluded that most people rarely stray more than a few miles from home.
The first-of-its-kind study by Northeastern University raises privacy and ethical questions for its monitoring methods, which would be illegal in the United States.
It also yielded somewhat surprising results that reveal how little people move around in their daily lives. Nearly three-quarters of those studied mainly stayed within a 20-mile-wide circle for half a year.
That might seem like science and data being marshaled to prove the obvious. But the researchers said their work, which also shows that people exhibit similar patterns whether they travel long distances or short ones, could open new frontiers in fields such as disease tracking and urban planning.
"Slices of our behavior are preserved in these electronic data sets," said Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, an author of the project and the director of the Center for Complex Network Research at Northeastern University in Boston. "This is creating huge opportunities for science."
The study found that nearly half of the people in the study largely kept to a circle little more than six miles wide and that 83 percent largely stayed within a 37-mile-wide circle.
Nearly 3 percent of the people regularly went beyond a 200-mile-wide circle. Less than 1 percent of people traveled often out of a 621-mile circle.
Movement patterns
The researchers said they used the potentially controversial data only after any information that could identify individuals had been scrambled. Even so, they wrote, people's wanderings are so subject to routine that by using the patterns of movement that emerged from the research, "we can obtain the likelihood of finding a user in any location."
That type of nonconsensual tracking would be illegal in the United States, said Rob Kenny, a spokesman for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Consensual tracking, however, is legal and marketed as a special feature by some U.S. cellphone-service providers.
The study, published today in the journal Nature, opens up the field of human tracking for science and calls attention to what experts said is an emerging issue of locational privacy.
The researchers were able to obtain the data from a European provider of cellphone service that was obligated to collect the information. By agreement with the company, the researchers did not identify the provider or disclose the country where the provider operates.
![]()
The researchers, including Barabasi's Northeastern colleagues Marta Gonzalez and Cesar Hidalgo, tracked 100,000 cellphone users selected at random from a population of 6 million for six months.
The location of the user was revealed whenever the user made or received a call or text message; the telephone company would record the nearest cell tower and time.
Because calls and messages tended to be sporadic, the researchers used a smaller data set that captured the location of 206 users every two hours. The results of the two data sets were similar, according to the report.
Privacy implications
The use of cellphones to track people, even anonymously, has implications for privacy that make this "a troubling study," said Marc Rotenberg, a founder of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, D.C.
The university said the U.S. Navy-funded experiment went to a Navy institutional review board, which determined the mobility study did not involve human research subjects. Bioethicist Arthur Caplan at the University of Pennsylvania disagreed with that board's determination.
"There is plenty going on here that sets off ethical alarm bells about privacy and trustworthiness," Caplan said.
Studies done on normal behavior at public places is "fair game for researchers" as long as no one can figure out identities, Caplan said in an e-mail.
"But my cellphone is not public. My cellphone is personal. Tracking it and thus its owner is an active intrusion into personal privacy."
Study co-author Hidalgo said there is a difference between being a statistic — such as how many people buy a certain brand of computer — and a specific example. The people tracked in the study are more statistics than examples, he said.
"In the wrong hands the data could be misused," Hidalgo said. "But in scientists' hands you're trying to look at broad patterns ... We're not trying to do evil things. We're trying to make the world a little better."
This story, published June 5, 2008 was corrected on June 21, 2008. A previous version of the story, The Associated Press, relying on information from a study co-author, erroneously reported that no ethics review of the study was required. The university says the U.S. Navy-funded experiment did go to a Navy institutional review board, which determined the mobility study did not involve human research subjects.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
Tight Senate vote launches health care over hurdle
Awaiting daughter's birth, astronaut busy on spacewalk
Anti-Taliban militias arise in Afghanistan
China coal mine blast death toll jumps to 87
Iran gets ready for military exercises

LA Galaxy's David Beckham
Los Angeles Galaxy's David Beckham talks about the upcoming MLS Cup final during after a team practice.
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- Italian lead prosecutor argues Knox motive was hatred
- Man shot in chest on E. Union Street in Capitol Hill
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Lynnwood is reinventing itself — again
- Mariners Blog | A Mariners-Tigers swap makes a whole lot of sense for both teams
- Italian prosecutors request life sentence for UW student
- Craigslist adoption ad: A plea by young mother-to-be? A scam?
- Mariners to try Dustin Ackley at second base
- Mariners Blog | Dustin Ackley to move to second base; Mariners add six to 40-man roster
- Genetics anti-bias law takes effect
- Senate vote clears hurdle
194 - First key vote today on Senate health bill
166 - Mariners add six to 40-man roster
140 - Man shot in Capitol Hill
91 - Lynnwood is reinventing itself — again
87 - Italian lead prosecutor argues Knox motive was hatred
73 - Saturday links
50 - Bye week answers, volume four
49 - Prosecutor requests life in prison for Amanda Knox
43 - Historic health care bill nears key Senate vote
37
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Nonprofits get creative using Twitter and Facebook to make donation easier
- Great places to cross-country ski for free (or almost) in the Methow
- Lynnwood is reinventing itself — again
- It's possible to recover a life lost to hoarding
- UW provost tapped for Nike's board
- 175 foster kids in Washington get 'forever families'
- Recipes: Sesame Pork Roast, Sour Cream Mashed Potatoes, Gingerbread with Lemon Sauce and more
- BofA moves to take control of Mastro building in Fremont
- Food-bank donations pour in after theft in Rainier Valley





