Originally published Saturday, May 3, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Fed pushes aggressive credit-card protections
The Federal Reserve Board moved Friday to end "unfair and deceptive" credit-card-industry practices assailing consumers who are already...
The proposals
THE NEW RULES would prohibit:Placing unfair time constraints on payments (a borrower would have a reasonable period of time, such as 21 days, to pay);
Unfairly allocating payments among balances with different interest rates, with lenders crediting payments to balances with lower rates;
Retroactively raising interest rates on pre-existing balances;
Placing too-high fees for exceeding the credit limit solely because of a hold placed on the account;
Unfairly computing balances in a tactic known as double-cycle billing;
Unfairly adding security deposits and fees for issuing credit or making credit available;
Making deceptive offers of credit.
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve Board moved Friday to end "unfair and deceptive" credit-card-industry practices assailing consumers who are already struggling to cope in a bad economy.
If approved, the regulations would be the biggest clampdown on the industry in decades, aiming at protecting people from credit-card companies that arbitrarily raise interest rates or don't give borrowers adequate time to pay their bills.
"The proposed rules are intended to establish a new baseline for fairness in how credit-card plans operate," Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said. "Consumers relying on credit cards should be better able to predict how their decisions and actions will affect their costs."
The banking industry promised a fight, saying the regulations would hurt consumers.
"The Federal Reserve's proposal is an unprecedented regulatory intrusion into marketplace pricing and product offerings," said Edward Yingling, president and chief executive of the American Banking Association. "We are deeply concerned that these rules will result in less competition, higher consumer prices, fewer consumer choices and reduced consumer access to credit cards. In short, everyday consumers will bear the real cost of these proposals."
The Federal Reserve Board said its new rules are part of an effort "to enhance protections for consumers who use credit cards." Its get-tough stance comes after the Fed was sharply criticized for not acting quickly enough in the face of a burgeoning mortgage crisis that has seen foreclosures skyrocket, home sales and prices plummet, and new-home construction falter.
"These steps are a significant improvement," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., a member of the Banking Committee and a leader in legislative efforts to make credit-card companies more forthcoming about the interest rates they charge. "While they can still go further, the Fed deserves credit for acting, particularly for banning some awful practices rather than relying solely on disclosure."
Tighter interest controls
The new rules would prohibit lenders from arbitrarily raising interest rates on any debt unless a promotional rate expires or the borrower was more than a month late in making a payment.
Payments also no longer could be classified as late if borrowers didn't receive their statements at least 21 days in advance of the due date.
The rules also would stop the practice of "double-cycle billing," in which lenders calculate one month of fees based on two months' worth of activity on an account, and would impose restrictions on how lenders compute balances.
Lenders also would be prohibited from allocating payments among balances with different interest rates in a way that benefits only lenders. That means lenders no longer could apply an entire payment only to the balance with the lowest rate, as lenders frequently do with so-called "zero-interest" balance transfers, leaving balances with higher interest rates to grow. Instead, lenders would be required to divide payments in a way that gives consumers the full benefit of any discounted rates.
The Fed said the new regulations could be finalized by Jan. 1.
The credit-card industry has been under attack on Capitol Hill since Democrats took control of Congress last year. The industry once faced greater controls, but when interest rates skyrocketed in the late 1970s, banks complained that the controls were hurting profits and reducing credit, and the regulations were eliminated. The result has been an industry that critics say has taken advantage of low-income and middle-class Americans, who increasingly are turning to credit cards to pay for living expenses.
"Credit-card industry abuses have become more pronounced in this troubled economy as more families turn to their credit cards to help pay bills, buy groceries and make ends meet," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., chairwoman of the House Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit subcommittee.
Maloney said she feared that action won't come soon enough.
"By the time the Fed gets around to finalizing its regulatory proposals, countless more cardholders could be facing sky-high interest rates that will bury them in mountains of inescapable debt," she said.
"Perplexing" rules
Yingling called the new rules "particularly perplexing," saying they'll reduce the availability of credit when the Fed is working to increase access to credit. He said the proposal would restrict card companies' ability to charge interest rates that reflect the risks of different consumers, similar to how insurance companies charge different rates depending on drivers' records.
"If card companies cannot fully reflect risk," he said, "then millions of consumers with good credit histories will end up with higher rates. ... Regulatory responses such as these are effectively price controls, which have never worked in the past, and we do not believe they will work here."
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
UPDATE - 01:13 PM
DC sniper's Muhammad's execution set for tonight
UPDATE - 01:10 PM
DOD worker assessed Fort Hood suspect months ago
UPDATE - 01:10 PM
Obama salutes Fort Hood victims, condemns murders
UPDATE - 11:24 AM
White House: Obama eyeing host of Afghan choices
UPDATE - 01:10 PM
North, South Korea clash at sea before Obama visit

Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Ken Auletta talks about Google with Brier Dudley at the Seattle Central Library.
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- 'Missing' SeaTac man found with new name, in new state
- Police: DNA from officer's slaying matches suspect
- Lt. governor's son shot by co-worker in Kent; gunman then shot self
- DNA, ballistics tie man to cop killing, police say
- McGinn next Seattle mayor; Mallahan concedes as vote gap widens
- Prosecutors consider charges against suspect in police shooting
- Three more fires ignite in Greenwood
- Steve Kelley | Hasselbeck gives Seahawks' sagging season a stay of execution
- Trucker dies as big-rig plummets off SF bridge
- Plans call for Triangle to become West Seattle gateway
- House health bill unacceptable to many in Senate
263 - Prosecutors prepare charges against suspect in police shooting
262 - Pelosi tours Seattle's Swedish after health-care vote
207 - McGinn more than doubles his lead over Mallahan
187 - King County OKs 'don't ask' law on immigration
181 - Resolute Fort Hood soldiers ready for return
130 - Time to bring Ken Griffey Jr. back in 2010
95 - 'Missing' SeaTac man found with new name, in new state
88 - Josh Smith picks UCLA
85 - DNA, ballistics tie man to cop killing, police say
73
- For 80-year-old Maple Valley man, hoops aren't just a dream
- Plans call for Triangle to become West Seattle gateway
- Three more fires ignite in Greenwood
- 'Missing' SeaTac man found with new name, in new state
- Silver Lake restaurant destroyed by fire
- Pakistani-American cafe, bar owner on verge of being Granite Falls mayor
- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tours Seattle's Swedish after health-care vote
- All You Can Eat | Fruit flies: thrill to the kill
- McGinn next Seattle mayor; Mallahan concedes as vote gap widens
- Rainier Pacific Financial calls rescue 'unlikely'








