Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Sunday, April 13, 2008 at 12:00 AM

Print

A pair of cases in which lawyers didn't stay silent

Lawyers in two states recently took the difficult step of breaking confidences to right what they saw as wrongs in controversial murder...

The Associated Press

Lawyers in two states recently took the difficult step of breaking confidences to right what they saw as wrongs in controversial murder cases.

In North Carolina, an appellate defender testified in 2007 that his former client — who committed suicide in prison in 2002 — told him two decades earlier that he was the sole killer in a double homicide and that co-defendant, Lee Wayne Hunt, had nothing to do with the crime.

Hunt, who is serving two life sentences, was not freed and a grievance was filed to the state bar against Staples Hughes, the lawyer, who spoke out. Hughes said a committee of the bar found the complaint had no merit.

Most states allow lawyers to reveal confidences to prevent a death, serious bodily harm or criminal fraud, but only a few have measures that permit them to disclose information to prevent wrongful incarceration, according to Colin Miller, an assistant professor of law at John Marshall Law School in Chicago.

Hughes said he knows some people might disagree with what he did but he believes he was not breaking the law.

"Is there bodily harm in [Hunt] being locked up the rest of his life for something he didn't do?" Hughes asked. "In my moral and ethical universe, I answered that question 'yes.' "

Hughes also said that while it was agonizing to remain silent so many years, the attorney-client privilege is essential.

Hunt's attorney is pursuing his case before a state inquiry commission that investigates claims of innocence.

In Virginia, a defense lawyer kept quiet for a decade, and finally — with approval from the state bar — disclosed information that alleged the prosecution had coached a former client whose co-defendant was sentenced to death.

After the lawyer's testimony, a judge commuted the death sentence of Daryl Atkins to life in prison.

But in February, the judge agreed to a prosecution request to stay the commutation order pending an appeal.

Atkins was at the center of a case that led to the U.S. Supreme Court banning the execution of the mentally disabled.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Nation & World headlines...

Print      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

advertising

UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port

UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya

UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes

Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates

Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising