Tuesday, December 4, 2007 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
E-mail article
Print view Share:
Digg
Newsvine
Divorce isn't resource efficient, study finds
WASHINGTON — Divorce can be bad for the environment. Each time a family dissolves, the result is two new households.
"A married household actually uses resources more efficiently than a divorced household," said Jianguo Liu, a sustainability expert with Michigan State University.
He and fellow researcher Eunice Yu concluded that in 2005, in the United States alone, divorced households could have saved 38 million rooms, 73 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity and 627 billion gallons of water if their "resource-use efficiency" had been comparable to that of married households.
Liu's analysis of the environmental impact of divorce appears in this week's online edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Besides the United States, Liu looked at 11 other countries, including Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Greece, Mexico and South Africa between 1998 and 2002.
In the 11, if divorced households had combined to have the same average household size as married households, there could have been a million fewer households using energy and water in these countries.
"People have been talking about how to protect the environment and combat climate change, but divorce is an overlooked factor that needs to be considered," Liu said.
Orly Zeewy, a brand-name consultant from Wynnewood, Pa., said when she and her husband split, the fate of the planet was the least of her worries.
But now, she can see the point, and not just related to the per-capita use of resources.
Her children, now 10 and 13, have two of just about everything, from clothing to toys. "You're basically setting up two households for the kids, so that they feel they live there."
Stuff "can get multiplied pretty quickly," she said.
Liu said that with the number of divorces rising, so is the number of households, outpacing population growth itself.
Liu, who is married, suggested that if more people knew the environmental consequences of divorce, more of them might choose to stay together.
Not likely, Zeewy said. "I can't imagine anyone would ever tell you they would stay together for the sake of the environment. That would not be at the top of my list."
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company
Obama's picks embrace shift in foreign policy
UPDATE - 08:05 AM
Ex-Kilpatrick aide pleads guilty in sex scandal
Experts seek remedy for health-care waste
Farmer charged with killing bald eagles "humbled" by pardon
Funeral museum adds Vatican exhibit

nwjobs


Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
Forget the gifts, honey. Let's give a little extra to the food bank this year.
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new truck? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
nwhomes

Find a new home or condo that fits your lifestyle.
Search New Developments
Builder Directory
- Fresno State's Pat Hill has interview with UW
- Gregoire looking at massive state budget cuts
- Wal-Mart worker trampled to death by frenzied Black Friday shoppers
- Canada's oil-sands boom creates vast riches and a dirty footprint
- Jerry Brewer | Solid start makes it easy to believe in Jack Zduriencik
- $478,000 donated in Rep. Dicks' name
- Spokane driver hits 7 cars in 13 minutes
- Ancient canoe found at bottom of Black Sea
- Men rob wheelchair-bound man, take groceries
- Students lie, cheat, steal, but say they're good
- Canada's oil-sands boom creates vast riches and a dirty footprint
- Gregoire looking at massive state budget cuts
- Wal-Mart worker trampled to death by frenzied Black Friday shoppers
- Channeled Scablands: remnants of a mighty roar
- Fresno State's Pat Hill has interview with UW
- Students lie, cheat, steal, but say they're good
- Laxative helps clear up skin problems
- 10 homework tips for parents
- Seattle newspaper collector stacks up all the print that can fit
- Stalled economy may idle Seattle-area architects






