Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWapartments | NWsource | Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times Nation & World

Mist

36°F

Sunday, October 21, 2007 - Page updated at 01:03 AM

E-mail article     Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Execution slowdown seen as opportunity by capital punishment opponents

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Stop executions for a while and perhaps they can be stopped forever. That calculation has been part of the strategy of capital punishment opponents for decades.

The Supreme Court-inspired slowdown in executions offers the first nationwide opportunity in decades to test whether the absence of regularly scheduled executions will lead some states to abandon the death penalty and change public attitudes about capital punishment.

Recent decisions by judges and elected officials have made clear that most executions will not proceed until the Supreme Court rules on two death-row inmates' challenge to the lethal injection procedures used by Kentucky. The inmates say Kentucky's method creates the risk of pain severe enough to be cruel and unusual punishment, banned by the Eighth Amendment.

Similar procedures are used by Texas, the far-and-away leader in lethal injections, and the 16 other states that have executed prisoners in the past two years.

It is clear the high court will not go so far as to outlaw the use of lethal injections. That issue is not even before the court in the Kentucky case.

Rather, the justices could decide whether Kentucky's procedures violate the Constitution and what standard the courts should use to evaluate the risk a prisoner will feel pain as he is put to death.

No matter how the court rules, it appears there will be few, if any, prisoners executed before the court rules, probably by late June.

"We're probably looking at delaying executions, not preventing them," said Ronald Tabak, a New York-based lawyer who has represented death-row inmates.

But Douglas Berman, a sentencing expert at the Ohio State University law school, said the possibility exists for more dramatic action.

"The abolitionists will say if we have no executions for six months to a year, and the universe is not imploding and murder rates are not going through the roof ... it becomes easier to say, 'Why do we even need the death penalty, let's just get rid of it,' " Berman said.

Questions about the administration of lethal injections are only part of the equation.

Death-penalty opponents also have pointed to doubts about the competence of some court-appointed defense lawyers and the rise in the number of exonerations through DNA evidence of people already convicted of crimes.

advertising

The last time the country went without executions for an extended period was from June 1967 to January 1977.

The Supreme Court in 1972 struck down 40 state death-penalty laws, but did not ban capital punishment as cruel and unusual.

Some justices at the time thought their decision in Furman v. Georgia would bring an end to the death penalty.

By 1976, though, in the midst of a "law-and-order" backlash to the court's decisions in favor of the rights of criminal defendants, elected officials in 35 states had adopted laws to comply with the death-penalty ruling.

A more conservative court upheld some of those laws and executions resumed.

Nearly 1,100 people have been put to death since 1977 and more than 3,000 others are on death row.

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

More nation & world headlines...

E-mail article Print view

advertising

Advertising

More Nation & World

Close-up: Big 3 make fuel-efficient return

Priceless gift to disadvantaged: Attending inauguration

Solar car shines at climate conference

Jewish settlers ousted from disputed house

Obama lawsuit at high court