Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published August 6, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified August 6, 2007 at 2:04 AM

Print

Close-up

Bridge collapses teach lessons in frailty

The 40-year-old bridge that collapsed in Minneapolis last week was built during an era when designers were confident they knew enough about...

The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — The 40-year-old bridge that collapsed in Minneapolis last week was built during an era when designers were confident they knew enough about bridge strength and weight loads that they could build bridges lighter and cheaper.

But a number of bridge collapses have taught engineers painful lessons about the frailty of bridges and the punishment they take from heavy trucks, strong tides and even the errant barge that slams into bridge supports, according to engineers, bridge builders and academics.

The challenge, they say, is that many of the nation's 594,709 bridges were built during the 1950s and 1960s, an era when designers didn't fully understand the effects of metal fatigue or other challenges. Now, many of those bridges are facing increased scrutiny.

"Maybe we out-thought ourselves for a little while," said Mal Kerley, chief engineer of Virginia, referring to postwar bridge-building when the interstate-highway system was created. "What has happened over time is that we learned things."

In 1883, the Brooklyn Bridge opened to horse-and-buggy traffic. Now it carries more than 144,000 vehicles a day. Because engineers on the Brooklyn Bridge and other spans did not have sophisticated methods to accurately calculate loads, they made their best guess — and then multiplied. The result was over-engineered, overbuilt structures that will probably outlast their newer brethren.

"The smaller the amount of knowledge you have, the bigger the factor of safety you use," said Joseph Yura, emeritus professor of civil engineering at the University of Texas. "In those days, you would do the calculations and the chief engineer would just up everything by one size."

Today, bridge designers are again taking a more conservative approach. Spans are built with stronger materials, redundant support systems and super-strength steel that can withstand the pounding of thousands of vehicles a day.

But after World War II, with steel prices as high as the nation's confidence, engineers thought they could "minimize materials and maximize stresses," Kerley said.

The result was structures such as the Frederick Douglass Bridge over the Anacostia River in Washington, D.C. Built in 1950, the Douglass Bridge sits on only two main horizontal steel beams, bolstered by vertical supports. The main beams were so thin that engineers at the time attached numerous vertical "stiffeners" to keep the beams from bending.

The stiffeners required a lot of manual welding, but "steel was more expensive and labor was less expensive" at the time, said Kathleen Penney, deputy chief engineer of D.C.'s Department of Transportation.

If the Douglass Bridge were built today, she said, the steel used would be 25 percent thicker, there would be more than two main beams in case one failed, and there would be far fewer welds and connections to minimize the number of corrosion and fatigue points.

"Collectively, there was more confidence in using less material," Penney said. "Since that time, we've had a lot of experiences that pushed us back to more conservative approaches."

advertising

One of those key experiences took place Dec. 15, 1967, when the Silver Bridge connecting Point Pleasant, W.Va., and Kanauga, Ohio, collapsed, killing 46 people.

Within one minute, according to the National Transportation Safety Board report, the 700-foot center span, two 38-foot side spans and both towers collapsed into the Ohio River. The investigation found that a crack caused by metal fatigue in a single piece brought down the entire bridge.

Metal fatigue occurs when steel is flexed — by the weight of 80,000-pound trucks, for example — over and over until it becomes brittle and fails. It is the same principle as bending a paper clip back and forth: At first it bends, but eventually it breaks.

"That was the first time we as engineers really became aware of the elements of fatigue and fracture," said Sue Lane, an engineer and manager of codes and standards with the American Society of Civil Engineers. Today, she said, bridges are built with fewer joints, stronger and more flexible steel and greater redundancy.

In June 1983, a 100-foot section of Interstate 95 collapsed into the Mianus River in Greenwich, Conn., killing three people.

The NTSB found that metal fatigue, corrosion and a lack of rigorous inspections contributed to the failure of one of the bridge's two main supports, which then brought down the rest of the structure. The bridge had been built in the mid-1950s.

Today, bridges are built with multiple structural elements, so the failure of one piece doesn't lead to a total collapse.

"Redundancy is all about sharing," Lane said. "If four of us are moving a piano and one of us falls, maybe three will be able to hold it up. But not if there are only two carrying it."

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

UPDATE - 10:01 AM
Rebels tighten hold on Libya oil port

UPDATE - 09:29 AM
Reality leads US to temper its tough talk on Libya

UPDATE - 09:38 AM
2 Ark. injection wells may be closed amid quakes

Armed guards save Dutch couple from Somali pirates

Navy to release lewd video investigation findings

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising