Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Nation & World


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published April 20, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified April 20, 2007 at 2:02 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Endangered-species listing sought for U.S. beluga whales

The dwindling beluga whale population in Alaska's famed Cook Inlet could be extinct in 100 years and should be listed as an endangered species...

McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — The dwindling beluga whale population in Alaska's famed Cook Inlet could be extinct in 100 years and should be listed as an endangered species, a federal agency said Thursday.

The proposal is being made by the National Marine Fisheries Service, which studied a petition brought by environmentalists a year ago.

The findings, which were to be published today, are being strenuously opposed by business and industry groups — backed by all three members of Alaska's congressional delegation — who say the designation is unwarranted and economically damaging.

The report, which is not a final ruling, bypasses the lesser designation of "threatened" and goes straight to "endangered," which provides a greater level of protection for the 300 belugas that remain in the inlet.

The proposed listing sets in motion a 12-month review, during which the Fisheries Service will hold public hearings and identify critical habitat for the belugas. If the decision is upheld, the Bush administration could develop new rules requiring agencies such as the U.S. Corps of Engineers to consult with the Fisheries Service to ensure that no actions are taken to jeopardize the whales.

While still preliminary, the decision is a huge victory for local and national environmental groups that have been trying to get the belugas listed as an endangered species for the past decade.

"This is a very important milestone," said Bob Shavelson of Cook Inletkeeper, part of a coalition of environmental groups that petitioned the Fisheries Service a year ago.

Development groups and local governments along Cook Inlet have argued that restrictions on human activity in the inlet could cause big problems. Among the concerns: Gas and oil development, commercial fishing, a $340 million expansion of the Port of Anchorage and a proposed bridge.

"All it's going to do is impose additional costs and delays, at no added benefit," said Jason Brune, executive director of the Resources Development Council, a statewide business association that represents energy, mining, tourism and Native corporations.

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

More Nation & World headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

advertising

Obama seeks equal partnership in Asia

NYC trial for 9/11 suspects poses risks

Madoff employees arrested

Fort Hood gunman contacted Pakistan, lawmaker says

Immigration on White House agenda

Advertising

Video

Girls Soccer: Mercer Island vs. Glacier Peak
Mercer Island defeats Glacier Peak, 2-1, in a 3A state playoff quarterfinal on Saturday, Nov. 14.

Smash Putt! Miniature Golf
Opening day at Crystal Mountain
Video shows violent arrest by SPD
Fort Lewis Memorial
Highlights: Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Seattle International Cabaret Festival
Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Medal of Honor
Pelosi answers questions at Swedish Medical Center

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising