advertising
Link to jump to start of content The Seattle Times Company Jobs Autos Homes Rentals NWsource Classifieds seattletimes.com
The Seattle Times Nation & World
Traffic | Weather | Your account Movies | Restaurants | Today's events

Friday, October 6, 2006 - Page updated at 12:00 AM

E-mail article     Print view

NATO takes control of U.S. troops in eastern Afghanistan

Los Angeles Times

KABUL, Afghanistan — NATO on Thursday took command of U.S. troops fighting insurgents in eastern Afghanistan, putting the Western alliance in charge of security amid an increase in fighting.

British army Lt. Gen. David Richards, NATO's commander in Afghanistan, called the transition historic for the alliance and for Afghanistan. He said the transfer of U.S. forces under his command would not mean a reduction in capability.

"By bringing all of these forces under unified command we enhance the effectiveness of the operation, as we have far greater flexibility in the use of our assets," Richards told a handover ceremony attended by Afghan President Hamid Karzai. "Throughout Afghanistan we will continue to confront insurgents when and where necessary.

"But the overarching purpose of our security operations is to enable improvements in government capacity and to accelerate reconstruction and development, for real benefit to the lives of all Afghans."

NATO has about 31,000 troops from 37 countries under its command in Afghanistan; 10,000 are U.S. forces in eastern provinces bordering Pakistan.

Cross-border attacks are on the rise there despite Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's repeated commitments to rein in militants.

About 8,000 U.S. troops will remain under direct American command to serve as a counterterrorism force and to support reconstruction projects, as well as to help train and equip the Afghan army and police.

NATO originally agreed to deploy troops in Afghanistan as peacekeepers in support of aid projects, but the alliance is now waging its first ground war in its 57 years. And as the violence escalates, NATO commanders are struggling to persuade 26 member nations to fulfill a request for an additional 2,500 troops.

NATO commanders also have complained that some member governments place restrictions on what their troops can do in Afghanistan, making it more difficult to launch coordinated combat operations.

Richards took command of forces in southern Afghanistan on July 31. Since then, at least 16 foreign soldiers have died in hostile fire, seven of them Americans.

advertising

U.S. forces have suffered the highest number of combat deaths among foreign forces this year, with at least 50 Americans killed in hostile fire. Canadian forces have had 27 combat deaths.

Together, Americans and Canadians account for almost three-quarters of the foreign forces' deaths under hostile fire in Afghanistan this year.

The insurgents' heavy toll against Canadian troops is putting political heat on Canada's Conservative Party government. In a recent opinion poll, 59 percent of respondents agreed with the statement that Canadian soldiers "are dying for a cause we cannot win." An earlier poll found that more than half of Canadian respondents believe their country is more likely to be attacked by terrorists because their nation's forces are in Afghanistan.

NATO's supreme allied commander, U.S. Marine Gen. James L. Jones, says he is confident the alliance can handle any military challenge but believes "Afghanistan will not be resolved by military means."

Defeating the insurgency depends more on "how well the reconstruction mission, the international aid mission, is focused," he said Wednesday while in Washington.

Copyright © 2006 The Seattle Times Company

Marketplace

advertising