| Traffic | Weather | Your account | Movies | Restaurants | Today's events |
|
|
Wednesday, June 7, 2006 - Page updated at 12:00 AM In Canada, mum's the word on marriage of gay MountiesThe Washington Post
TORONTO — It promises to be a grand June wedding, two scarlet-coated officers of the famed Royal Canadian Mounted Police standing before a justice of the peace with an escort of similarly spiffy Mounties observing the nuptials on the eve of Canada Day, a national holiday. When the two constables become the first male Mounties to marry each other, the grumpiest witness-from-afar might well be Prime Minister Stephen Harper. The planned union of Jason Tree and David Connors in Nova Scotia on June 30 has cast a spotlight on Harper's pledge to his conservative backers to try to roll back same-sex marriage laws. Harper has not spoken publicly about the upcoming wedding and has ordered his party members to shut up about the matter, an attempt to silence lawmakers that has served to draw more attention to the issue while sparking complaints about the prime minister's heavy-handedness. "I think it's great if we change the public perception," said Tree, 27, who patrols a stretch of rural fishing communities along the Bay of Fundy. "If the public sees the RCMP as representing the diversity of the community, that is good." About 25 miles away, Connors, 28, helps to police Yarmouth, a town of 8,000. The two men met in college eight years ago and have been partners since. Tree said he had been open about their relationship since he joined the force six years ago, and "from the outset, I have never had a single problem." The force has assigned the two men close together, as it does with other couples, and fellow officers "have all been great," Tree said from their home in Meteghan, southwest of Halifax. "There does exist that social stereotype of a kind of straight, masculine image of police," he added. "We say you can be in the force and be gay." Tree and Connors decided to join thousands of other same-sex couples getting married in Canada. In 2003, Ontario's highest court ruled that same-sex couples could not be denied marriage. Courts in other provinces followed. Last July, Canada's Parliament bowed to the judicial momentum and narrowly approved same-sex marriages throughout the country. But the Liberal-led government was replaced in February by Harper's Conservative Party, which includes staunch opponents of gay marriage. The party platform included a pledge to ask Parliament to reopen the issue. But Harper has been in no hurry; he said Friday he would introduce the resolution sometime in the fall.
When Harper last month ordered his Conservative caucus members not to speak about the matter, he further soured relations with Canadian reporters over what they call his unprecedented attempts to control the news. "If they speak about gay rights, same-sex marriage, abortion, the risk is the Conservative Party will be portrayed as extremist," said David Rayside, a professor of political science at the University of Toronto and director of the Center for Sexual Diversity Studies. "In the United States, they would not pass as extremists. But in Canada, they would. There is a gap between Canadian and American attitudes." The U.S. military, for example, does not officially permit gay relationships. In Canada, two servicemen were married on an air force base last June, and the RCMP says it has no objection to the upcoming ceremony. But the marriage of Tree and Connors has clashed head-on with the foremost icon of Canada's national image of virile, outdoorsy strength — the square-jawed Mountie of popular lore. "This busts some stereotypes," Hasselriis said. "We talk about the Mounties getting their man, but I don't think a lot of people thought about getting their man this way." The image of the 22,561-member RCMP has already evolved. Women joined in 1974; they now make up 17 percent of the police officers. In 1990, Sikh Mounties were permitted to trade the flat-brimmed Mountie hat for their traditional turban. But Tree and Connors' uniformed matrimony goes too far for some. "This does nothing to strengthen the family," said Dave Bylsma, president of the Ontario Council of the Christian Heritage Party. "Personally, it doesn't matter to me if they are RCMP or dogcatchers or garbagemen. But they are obviously using the fact that they are Mounties to rub our nose in it." British couple fights for recognition LONDON — Two women asking Britain to recognize their Canadian same-sex marriage argued in court Tuesday that their relationship is like that of any other married couple and calling it a civil partnership violated their human rights. Sue Wilkinson and Celia Kitzinger, both university professors, married in Vancouver in 2003. They went before the High Court aiming to set a precedent that could force Britain to recognize same-sex marriages performed abroad as legal unions. They argue that the British law that recognizes their union as a "civil partnership" and not a marriage is a violation of their human rights. Wilkinson and Kitzinger, who have been together for 16 years, exchanged vows during a ceremony in Canada, where same-sex marriages are legal. Last year, Britain enacted the Civil Partnerships Bill, which gives same-sex couples the right to form legally binding partnerships and entitling them to most of the same tax and pension rights married couples possess. When the bill became law, Wilkinson and Kitzinger's Canadian marriage was termed a civil partnership, which lawyer Karon Monaghan argued was "downgraded" and a "lesser substitute." "The petitioner and her wife do not seek a special new form of recognition. They seek only recognition of their lawful marriage — marriage being a universally socially understood institution," Monaghan said. Britain's attorney-general and Lord Chancellor — the country's senior legal figure — are opposing the motion. The case is scheduled to last three days, with a decision expected in July. The Netherlands, Canada, Belgium and Spain have legalized same-sex marriage, while several other European countries have laws similar to Britain's. In the United States, only the state of Massachusetts allows gay marriage, while Vermont and Connecticut permit civil unions. Also Australia's conservative government will overrule same-sex marriage laws in the nation's capital, Prime Minister John Howard said Tuesday, saying marriage should only be between men and women. Howard's move follows new laws by the self-governing Australian Capital Territory (ACT) to allow same-sex unions. National laws in Australia say a marriage must be between a man and woman at the exclusion of all others, but the ACT laws would have given gay couples the same legal rights as married couples by describing the marriages as "civil unions." Additional reports from The Associated Press and Reuters Copyright © 2006 The Seattle Times Company Most read articles
|
|