advertising
Link to jump to start of content The Seattle Times Company Jobs Autos Homes Rentals NWsource Classifieds seattletimes.com
The Seattle Times Nation & World
Traffic | Weather | Your account Movies | Restaurants | Today's events

Wednesday, May 10, 2006 - Page updated at 12:00 AM

Print

Beetlejuice? Check the label

The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — Never mind that fly in your soup. Consider the bugs that may be in your juice, yogurt and eye shadow.

The Food and Drug Administration is deliberating a rule that would require food companies to state on their labels if a product contains additives made out of insects that, when crushed and processed, yield a rich red or a vivid orange color.

The additives — carmine and cochineal extract — can cause allergic reactions in a small number of people, including flushing, hives, eczema, sneezing and anaphylaxis, a severe, sudden reaction that can result in death.

The additives have been used for centuries and come from female beetles imported from Peru, the Canary Islands, Bolivia, Chile and South Africa.

The FDA said the beetle-derived ingredients are used in 815 cosmetic products, most of which already are labeled. The additives also produce the lovely pinks, purples and reds that perk up juices, Popsicles, cosmetic face blush, the cherries in fruit cocktail that little kids love, port wine cheese, artificial crab meat, strawberry milk drinks, caviar, a fruit-based aperitif and other products.

Some Yoplait yogurt made by General Mills, for example, uses carmine. It is listed on the ingredient label, and the company said it had no plans to discontinue its use.

The FDA, based on company testing, declared carmine and cochineal extract safe in the 1960s. Companies at that time said they had received no adverse reports from the substances' use.

It wasn't until about a decade ago that medical reports surfaced showing the additives can cause allergic reactions. That caught the eye of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. The watchdog group and several physicians petitioned the FDA in 1998 to ban the additives or to at least require companies to list them and their insect derivation.

"We're urging the FDA to get rid of it. Here is an opportunity to protect people from unnecessary reactions. When reactions are life-threatening, they [the FDA] should get it off the market," said Michael Jacobson, executive director of the CSPI.

Jacobson said the dyes can be replaced by other artificial or natural dyes.

advertising
The FDA proposed in January that foods containing carmine and cochineal extract list them on their labels. Retail cosmetics already must list them, but the FDA proposal adds "professional-use" cosmetics and gifts or free samples that often come with promotions to buy cosmetics.

The comment period ended May 1.

Companies would have two years to change their labeling under the proposal, which could cost up to $3 million, the FDA said.

Because they come from insects, carmine and cochineal extract are considered natural additives and now can be accounted for on a label as simply "artificial color" or "color added." There are many other natural color additives in that group, including beet powder and grape-skin extract.

Under FDA rules, colors used in food processing that are not derived from plants or animals must be listed by name, such as FD&C Red No. 40.

In its proposal, the FDA cited 35 cases of allergic reactions since 1994 from Ruby Red grapefruit juice, purple eye shadow and other products. Jacobson said the number is likely much higher because his group assumes that many cases are not reported.

Pediatric allergist Scott Sicherer at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York said he has not seen reactions in patients. But he urged a listing of the additives as ingredients. "It's a rare allergen, but there's no reason not to label it," Sicherer said.

The Food Products Association, the country's largest trade group serving the food-and-beverage industry, doesn't object to putting the words on the label, said Robert Earl, senior director of nutrition policy. "Many of our companies have been listing it for years," he said.

But the group complained in its comment: "Numerous food ingredients and additives are derived from animals, including insects. FDA does not require a statement about insect derivation about any of those ingredients or additives, such as honey or shellac."

If the FDA doesn't ban the additives, the CSPI thinks the next best thing to is to tell consumers what carmine and cochineal extract are.

In the proposal, however, the FDA said that if people don't know what the words mean, they can look them up. "Information on the origin of these color additives is readily available to those consumers who want it. This information is provided in standard dictionaries for the words 'cochineal' and 'carmine.' "

Copyright © 2006 The Seattle Times Company

Marketplace

advertising

advertising

More shopping