![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Your account | Today's news index | Weather | Traffic | Movies | Restaurants | Today's events | ||||||||
|
|
Friday, April 09, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.
Movie Review By Moira Macdonald
It's yet another terrific, oddball character turn for Thornton's résumé, and it's heaven-sent: "The Alamo," otherwise, suffers from good intentions but tepid results.
Blame the screenplay, which spent years in development (three writers are credited; others, such as John Sayles, are known to have worked on it) and has a definite made-by-committee feel to it. Hancock, except for some occasional sputters (mostly from Thornton), never succeeds in bringing history to life. The film plods along, like those Mexican soldiers, arriving at its destination in serviceable yet unmemorable fashion. The familiar story of the doomed Texas settlement is here centered on three men, all members of the Alamo troops: William Travis (Patrick Wilson), the young commanding officer; James Bowie (Jason Patric), a popular colonel suffering from a terminal disease; and Crockett, who is dismayed to find that he has arrived at the Alamo just in time for trouble. ("I understood the fighting was over," he says, the grin freezing on his suddenly immobile face. "Ain't it?") Though Dennis Quaid, Hancock's star in "The Rookie," has top billing, he's really barely in the movie as Gen. Sam Houston, racking up just enough screen time to show off his muttonchop sideburns and bookend the story. Patric does his manly best with an oddly written character; Bowie seems to alternate between energetically whipping out his huge namesake knife and coughing into a blood-stained handkerchief like a frontier Camille. Wilson, so good in HBO's "Angels in America," is a tad miscast; though Travis is described as a dandy, Wilson looks almost too refined here, striding around in his custom-made blue coat like a stern peacock among drab hens. The two men are scripted as polar opposites who come to an understanding on Bowie's sickbed (he gets multiple death scenes, surely any actor's dream) it may be history, but it's too meticulous to be believable. Hancock's movie is rich in color and period detail (there's a gorgeous shot of the Mexican army, their red-and-gold uniforms glowing through fields of gray-white snow), and it's never unwatchable. But you get the sense that it's been jiggered with a few too many times, and you just keep wanting more of Crockett, a man both shaped and amused by his own myth (he wears a coonskin cap, he says, because "that feller in the play" wears one). The film ends on an elegant shot of the Alamo as the evening light fades, and on one last peek at Thornton's leathered face as he gazes into the waning sun, as if he's been mysteriously resurrected or as if the filmmakers realized, too late, that he was the movie. Moira Macdonald: mmacdonald@seattletimes.com.
Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
seattletimes.com home
Home delivery
| Contact us
| Search archive
| Site map
| Low-graphic
NWclassifieds
| NWsource
| Advertising info
| The Seattle Times Company